New Madrid Fault, When will it Snap?

77197485-new-madrid

New Madrid Fault

What is the New Madrid fault line, and why is it so much on the tips of tongues these days?
The New Madrid fault line essentially follows the Mississippi River from Illinois to Arkansas.

http://www.ceri.memphis.edu/public/facts_long.shtml
The New Madrid fault system, or the New Madrid seismic zone, is a series of faults beneath the continental crust in a weak spot known as the Reelfoot Rift. It cannot be seen on the surface. The fault system extends 150 miles southward from Cairo, Illinois through New Madrid and Caruthersville, Missouri, down through Blytheville, Arkansas to Marked Tree, Arkansas. It dips into Kentucky near Fulton and into Tennessee near Reelfoot Lake, and extends southeast to Dyersburg, Tennessee. It crosses five state lines, and crosses the Mississippi River in at least three places.

Seems like a local affair, but this is deceptive.
Where quakes along the West Coast of the US cause a jolt in the underlying rock, the area surrounding the New Madrid is essentially mud, soil, wet from the mighty Mississippi and Missouri and Tennessee and Ohio rivers which join near the New Madrid fault line, and liquifaction thus affects a huge area.

Liquifaction
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soil_liquefaction
The shock or repeated shock of earthquake waves can cause water-saturated soil to rearrange itself in such a way that it essentially becomes a suspension of solids in the liquid. Heavy structures on such areas can suddenly sink or shift. Buried objects can shift and relatively low density objects can float to the surface.

The last great quakes on the New Madrid fault line occurred in the Winter of 1811-1812.

http://quake.wr.usgs.gov/prepare/factsheets/NewMadrid/
The 400 terrified residents in the town of New Madrid (Missouri) were abruptly awakened by violent shaking and a tremendous roar. It was December 16, 1811, and a powerful earthquake had just struck. This was the first of three magnitude-8 earthquakes and thousands of aftershocks to rock the region that winter. Survivors reported that the earthquakes caused cracks to open in the earth’s surface, the ground to roll in visible waves, and large areas of land to sink or rise. By winter’s end, few houses within 250 miles of the Mississippi River town of New Madrid (Missouri) remained undamaged. The crew of the New Orleans (the first steamboat on the Mississippi, which was on her maiden voyage) reported mooring to an island only to awake in the morning and find that the island had disappeared below the waters of the Mississippi River. Damage was reported as far away as Charleston, South Carolina, and Washington, D.C.
In September of 2008, FEMA’s associate administrator for Response and Recovery, William Carwile, told a Senate panel that FEMA has five regional groups planning for possible earthquake responses, but a major quake along the New Madrid fault line could displace 7.2 million people and knock out 15 bridges. The response would require 42,000 first responders from local firefighters to the Pentagon.”

“Although Memphis is likely to be the focus of major damage in the region, St. Louis, Mo., Little Rock, Ark., and many small and medium sized cities would also sustain damage, ” the U.S.. Geological Survey found.

South Carolina is home to an active fault line, which could also produce a catastrophic earthquake.

A quake in Charleston in 1886 was a magnitude 7.6. That city in 2008 had a population in excess of 348,000. Much of that state’s coastal area is at risk.”

This year marks the bi-centennial of the New Madrid Quake. Mr. Nations is not the only one concerned many communities are making preparations and there aregeologists warning of the dangers. A new report out recently also stresses Americans are not prepared. FEMA is also asking that groups take part in the Great Earthquake ShakeOut Drill. A Map that shows the locations of the nuclear plants along the New Madrid Fault zone can be viewed here.

Just how far ranging was the effect, compared to a quake of similar Richter on the West Coast?

http://quake.wr.usgs.gov/prepare/factsheets/NewMadrid/
Earthquakes in the central or eastern United States affect much larger areas than earthquakes of similar magnitude in the western United States. For example, the San Francisco, California, earthquake of 1906 (magnitude 7.8) was felt 350 miles away in the middle of Nevada, whereas the New Madrid earthquake of December 1811 (magnitude 8.0) rang church bells in Boston, Massachusetts, 1,000 miles away. Differences in geology east and west of the Rocky Mountains cause this strong contrast. [And more recently] earthquakes of similar magnitude-the 1895 Charleston, Missouri, earthquake in the New Madrid seismic zone and the 1994 Northridge, California, earthquake, [showed similar effects].
 
http://edition.cnn.com/2005/TECH/science/06/22/new.madrid.quake/
The [quake] in 1968, centered in southeastern Illinois near the confluence of the Tennessee and Ohio rivers, caused moderate damage, but it was felt across 23 states — as far as the Carolinas — and into Canada.

A map on the USGS website shows the relative extent of influence, which is far more dramatic than might be imagined.
In 1994 the 6.7 Richter Northridge quake was felt throughout southern California, barely reaching over the border into Nevada and Arizona and Mexico.
The comparable 1895 Charleston, MO quake covered the eastern half of the US, primarily affected, of course, were the states central to the New Madrid fault line – Ohio, Kentucky, Tennessee, Arkansas, Missouri, Illinois, and Indiana.
But the effect covered at least half of the states of Wisconsin, Michigan, Pennsylvania, Virginia, North and South Carolina, Georgia, Alabama, Mississippi, Louisiana, Oklahoma, Kansas, and Iowa, and crossed the border into the states of New York and Florida.

But the seriousness of the situation is not described by the effects of quakes in 1811 and 1895, as going into the pole shift, during the quakes preceding the pole shift, there is another aspect to the fault line adjustments.
There is an Earth torque, cause by the twisting of the globe that causes tugs on the S Pole of Earth and the highly magnetized Atlantic Rift, daily.

Discussions

What are the chances of a Major earthquake in the New Madrid Fault Zone?

Q: I’ve been hearing about small quakes in Oklahoma and then in South Carolina and I just wondered if there is any danger from this fault. Thank You, Mr. Peanut, for the article. It’s very informative.

A: The chances are very good. Wikipedia says that “The New Madrid fault and Earthquake prone region is considered at high risk today” Here’s a great article on the subject: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1812_New_Madrid_earthquake

How could new madrid fault created?

Q: is it created by the new madrid earthquake that happened about 200 years ago or is it because of something else? what is the impact of the new madrid earthquake?

A: The New Madrid earthquake occurred because it is the boundary between two tectonic plates (or more likely a large crack or fault in the N America plate). It probably was there long before the earthquake 200+ years ago. All earthquake faults are areas where there are cracks between two huge pieces of the earth’s crust or, at least, two very substantial bodies of rock. If there was another earthquake the size of the one 200 years ago, it would be pretty bad for St Louis and all the small cities and towns in that part of Mo & Il. Given that the last one did some damage in Chicago and the fact that there are a LOT more buildings in that part of the country today, the damage could be really bad. Look at what happened in Italy this weekend and that was a fairly small quake. Of course there are lots of other potentially devastating natural phenomena that would be as bad or worse.

When do you think the New Madrid Fault will cause a devastating Earthquake?

Q: I live in Southwest Missouri, but I’m originally from Southeast Missouri. With all these big Earthquakes in Chile and Haiti there’s been a lot of talk around here that the New Madrid could be next. I know it’s been predicted for many years now that it could happen anytime. When do you think it will happen? How bad do you think it will be?

A: I live in Middle Tennessee, and the New Madrid fault has been one of my worst fears for a long time. I thought Middle TN would be far enough away, at first, to avoid serious damage. But after hearing that the earthquakes in 1811 and 1812 rang churchbells in boston, cracked sidewalks in Washington DC, and made the Mississippi flow backwards for a little while that kind of scared me. I have done a lot of reading, and surprisingly the shockingly high (or so it seems) number of earthquakes we have been having is normal! Heck, with one hitting Turkey just this morning I might be suspicious, but here is a link to a USGS question… I would also suggest checking out the link provided in their answer to help put things into perspective: http://www.usgs.gov/faq/faq.asp?id=153&category_id=10 Something else that might make you feel better… In 2009 experts have been saying that they think the fault is dying, or shutting down. It doesn’t really compare to active faults out there today, plus they think the small earthquakes we have today are still aftershocks from the 3 really really big ones almost 200 years ago. You can get more info by clicking this link: http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/03/090313145956.htm Hope this makes you feel better. If you still want to play it safe (which you should) there are a few links on USGS all about earthquake safety and how to prepare. Remember to have an evacuation plan ready with your WHOLE family and a survival kit in your home… Also …Look into earthquake insurance!

Regarding recent EQ activity in California and New Madrid fault zones?

Q: I have noticed a lot of EQ activity in California, usually up to 4.2 or so. It’s all over the state (Northern, Central, and Southern). Also noticed activity in the New Madrid seismic region in the midwest, though on a much smaller scale, 1s and 2s on the richter. Do these mean that a larger quake is coming in the relatively near future? I know New Madrid is pretty close to due for a quake. For the record, since someone brought it up, I do NOT live in either region. I am just seismically curious.

A: I don’t know if that fault is due for a big one like the San Andreas fault is. Because a fault is recently active doesn’t mean a BIG ONE is coming for that fault. The small quakes could just be a release of pressure on the fault and a larger one would not be needed. On the other hand these small quakes could be small slips adding pressure or getting closer to a larger slip or break on the fault. This is something we can’t be sure of. Also these small quakes on the New Madrid fault could also be effecting other faults by adding pressure or movement which could lead to quakes on these faults.

Is BP responsible for the recent tectonic activity along the New Madrid fault?

Q: What in the world is happening in the middle of the United States right now? Thousands of birds are falling dead from the skies, tens of thousands of fish are washing up on shore dead, earthquakes are popping up in weird and unexpected places and people are starting to get really freaked out about all of this. Well, one theory is that the New Madrid fault zone is coming to life. The New Madrid fault zone is six times bigger than the San Andreas fault zone in California and it covers portions of Illinois, Indiana, Missouri, Arkansas, Kentucky, Tennessee and Mississippi. The biggest earthquakes in the history of the United States were caused by the New Madrid fault. Now there are fears that the New Madrid fault zone could be coming to life again, and if a “killer earthquake” does strike it could change all of our lives forever. Jack M. Reed, a retired Texaco geologist-geophysicist, has been carefully studying the geology of the Gulf of Mexico for over 40 years. Reed is convinced that the Gulf of Mexico is currently tectonically active, and that the Gulf of Mexico is the source for most seismic activity along the New Madrid fault. One interesting theory is that the “oil volcano” unleashed by the BP oil spill in 2010 may have sparked renewed seismic activity in that part of the world. According to Reed,… “This entire zone through the United States is suffering some type of tectonic activity that I believe is tied to the deeply buried tectonics in the Gulf of Mexico.” http://www.aapg.org/explorer/2002/11nov/rift_zone.cfm So did BP disturb those “deeply buried tectonics” by drilling such a deep well and unleashing all that oil that flowed into the Gulf of Mexico? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7wVYS5Be-vg&feature=player_embedded http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o0tVbjrbkp8&feature=player_embedded EDIT: Teekno,…what are you talking about? Have hundreds of birds been falling from the sky and THOUSANDS of fish been washing ashore DEAD for 1000’s of years? REALLY? Huh!

A: I don’t know, it needs more investigation. Of course some will poo-poo it and call it a waste of money. Somebody need to get it through their heads money won’t matter when the planet dies.

Could there be a New Madrid fault line earthquake?

Q: How likely is a New Madrid Fault Line earthquake? With the dead birds and flooding in that area.

A: Dead birds have nothing to do with earthquakes. It could happen any day, but the odds of it happening any time soon are very remote. I live in So Cal and we are far more likely to get a big shake, but I don’t let it bother me. For teh New Madrid, it is more likely that it will happen to your kid’s kid’s kid’s kid’s kid’s kids. Or even further away than that.

Is it possible that the earthquake today in Illinois could set off the new madrid fault?

Q: I know they said it was a different fault but people along the new madrid fault have said for years that we are past due for “the big one”. so can an earthquake in one place cause and earthquake on a nearby fault?

A: it is possable. earthquakes arent predictable look here for a weird fact about the earthquake today http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=At3Kr6gVUiwoVomG_0X3qRHsy6IX;_ylv=3?qid=20080418203557AA2TrhS

What type of boundry is the new madrid fault?

Q: i’m doing a project for school. isnt the new madrid fault a transform boundry?

A: No, it’s an interplate seismic zone. So it’s like the Hawaiian hot spot in the middle of the Pacific Plate.

What type of fault is the New Madrid Fault?

Q: We are learning about the New Madrid Fault, I live about 20 miles south of New Madrid, Missouri, as a project we are to find what kind of fault the New Madrid Fault is (thrust,lateral,reverse, or normal). Also, could you tell me your source, correct answer with source will receive an automatic ten points.

A: The New Madrid fault system contains two types of faults, a strike slip segment oriented to the northeast, running from Marked Tree, AR to Caruthersville, MO, and a northwest trending reverse fault that rests below the New Madrid region. Material on the northwest side of the strike-slip fault moves northeast, and up the ramp.

What are the chance of a New Madrid fault line earthquake?

Q: Do you think there is a chance that a earthquake could hit the New Madrid Fault Line soon? I’m no geologist but it seems like something is getting ready to happen in that area with the dead birds now the flooding.

A: surface conditions such as rain and temperature do not affect earthquakes 10’s to 100’s of kilometers below the surface. However, tidal forces from the Sun and Moon can. Changes in rotational patterns. Other earthquakes. Anything that would change the stresses and forces. There is always a possibility for an old fault line to become active again, and to generate new fault lines. One would need to study the movement and stress patterns in the area to give a more accurate answer Also, there is a relationship between the type and size of fault and its strength Japan and Alaska have convergent plates and subduction causing potentially large quakes The Dead Sea and East Africa are on Divergent plate boundaries causing potentially small quakes The San Andreas is on a Translational plate boundary – sideways motion. -> medium sized quakes New Madrid is in the middle of the North American plate in a non-active to divergent plate boundary scenario. Quakes here would not be very strong or very often compared to Japan, Alaska or California

Executive Order — Establishment of the Presidential Commission of Election Administration

images

The White House

Office of the Press Secretary

For Immediate Release
March 28, 2013

Executive Order — Establishment of the Presidential Commission of Election Administration

EXECUTIVE ORDER

– – – – – – –

ESTABLISHMENT OF THE PRESIDENTIAL COMMISSION
ON ELECTION ADMINISTRATION

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, and in order to promote the efficient administration of Federal elections and to improve the experience of all voters, it is hereby ordered as follows:

Section 1. Establishment. There is established the Presidential Commission on Election Administration (Commission).

Sec. 2. Membership. (a) The Commission shall be composed of not more than nine members appointed by the President. The members shall be drawn from among distinguished individuals with knowledge about or experience in the administration of State or local elections, as well as representatives of successful customer service-oriented businesses, and any other individuals with knowledge or experience determined by the President to be of value to the Commission.

(b) The President shall designate two members of the Commission to serve as Co-Chairs.

Sec. 3. Mission. (a) The Commission shall identify best practices and otherwise make recommendations to promote the efficient administration of elections in order to ensure that all eligible voters have the opportunity to cast their ballots without undue delay, and to improve the experience of voters facing other obstacles in casting their ballots, such as members of the military, overseas voters, voters with disabilities, and voters with limited English proficiency.

In doing so, the Commission shall consider as appropriate:

(i) the number, location, management, operation, and design of polling places;

(ii) the training, recruitment, and number of poll workers;

(iii) voting accessibility for uniformed and overseas voters;

(iv) the efficient management of voter rolls and poll books;

(v) voting machine capacity and technology;

(vi) ballot simplicity and voter education;

(vii) voting accessibility for individuals with disabilities, limited English proficiency, and other special needs;

(viii) management of issuing and processing provisional ballots in the polling place on Election Day;

(ix) the issues presented by the administration of absentee ballot programs;

(x) the adequacy of contingency plans for natural disasters and other emergencies that may disrupt elections; and

(xi) other issues related to the efficient administration of elections that the Co-Chairs agree are necessary and appropriate to the Commission’s work.

(b) The Commission shall be advisory in nature and shall submit a final report to the President within 6 months of the date of the Commission’s first public meeting.

Sec. 4. Administration. (a) The Commission shall hold public meetings and engage with Federal, State, and local officials, technical advisors, and nongovernmental organizations, as necessary to carry out its mission.

(b) In carrying out its mission, the Commission shall be informed by, and shall strive to avoid duplicating, the efforts of other governmental entities.

(c) The Commission shall have a staff, which shall provide support for the functions of the Commission.

Sec. 5. Termination. The Commission shall terminate 30 days after it presents its final report to the President.

Sec. 6. General Provisions. (a) To the extent permitted by law, and subject to the availability of appropriations, the General Services Administration shall provide the Commission with such administrative services, funds, facilities, staff, equipment, and other support services as may be necessary to carry out its mission on a reimbursable basis.

(b) Insofar as the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.) (the “Act”), may apply to the Commission, any functions of the President under that Act, except for those in section 6 of the Act, shall be performed by the Administrator of General Services.

(c) Members of the Commission shall serve without any additional compensation for their work on the Commission, but shall be allowed travel expenses, including per diem in lieu of subsistence, to the extent permitted by law for persons serving intermittently in the Government service (5 U.S.C. 5701-5707).

(d) Nothing in this order shall be construed to impair or otherwise affect:

(i) the authority granted by law to a department, agency, or the head thereof; or

(ii) the functions of the Director of the Office of Management and Budget relating to budgetary, administrative, or legislative proposals.

(e) This order is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person.

BARACK OBAMA

60 Lab Studies Now Confirm Cancer Link to a Vaccine You Probably Had as a Child

nci-vol-2337-72_0
60 Lab Studies Now Confirm Cancer Link to a Vaccine You Probably Had as a Child
Via Citizens Action Network

For starters, the HPV vaccine Gardasil, which is being vigorously pushed on unsuspecting young girls and women to theoretically guard against cervical cancer still has never been proven to actually prevent cancer. On the contrary, evidence suggests that under certain circumstances the vaccine increases your risk of precancerous lesions by nearly 45 percent, and an ever increasing number of girls are being seriously injured by this unnecessary vaccine.

As of December 13, 2010, 20,915 adverse reactions had been reported in the United States alone, including 89 deaths, 297 miscarriages or stillbirths, and 370 reports of abnormal pap smears post vaccination.

All of this from a vaccine that has only been on the market for four years!

Making matters worse, as of 2009 the US FDA approved Gardasil for use on young boys as well, and the first male death has also been reported. In September of last year, a young boy died just eight days after being vaccinated with Gardasil.

So what’s going on here?

Is it possible that vaccines sold by drugmakers like Merck are causing lethal disease? Judging by history, the answer may be yes.

Contaminated Polio Vaccine Responsible for Human Cancer Cases

In 2002, the journal Lancet published compelling evidence that contaminated polio vaccine was responsible for up to half of the 55,000 non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma cases that were occurring each year.

What was it contaminated with?

SV40, a cancer-causing monkey virus. The puzzle began in 1994, when Dr. Michele Carbone, a Loyola University researcher, found the virus SV40, which had never before been detected in humans, in half of the human lung tumors he was studying. Since then, 60 different lab studies have confirmed the results, and SV40 has been found in a variety of human cancers, including lung-, brain-, bone-, and lymphatic cancer.

At first no one could fathom how the virus had been transmitted into the human population.

But in the censored interview with Dr. Maurice Hilleman above, Hilleman admits Merck’s responsibility in unleashing this virus via their polio vaccine, as well as the likelihood that there was an importing and spreading the AIDS virus in the same manner.

Just Who is Dr. Maurice Hilleman?

Now, for those of you who may think Dr. Hilleman was just another crackpot (he passed away in 2005), think again. He was, and still is, the leading vaccine pioneer in the history of vaccines. He developed more than three dozen vaccines—more than any other scientist in history—and was the developer of Merck’s vaccine program.

He was a member of the U.S. National Academy of Science, the Institute of Medicine, the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, and the American Philosophical Society, and received a special lifetime achievement award from the World Health Organization.

When he was chief of the Department of Respiratory Diseases with what’s now the Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, he discovered the genetic changes that occur when the influenza virus mutates, known as shift and drift. He was also one of the early vaccine pioneers to warn about the possibility that simian viruses might contaminate vaccines.So Dr. Hilleman knew what he was talking about. And in his own words, “vaccines have to be considered the bargain basement technology for the 20th Century.”

Vaccines Can Cause the Very Disease They’re Meant to Prevent, and Worse

For years, researchers suggested that millions of vials of polio vaccine, contaminated with SV40, infected individuals between 1953 and 1963 and caused human tumors, and by 1999, molecular evidence of SV40 infections were showing up in children born after 1982. Some experts now suggest the virus may have remained in the polio vaccine until as late as 1999.

Still, the FDA and health authorities turned a blind eye.

In addition, just like Gardasil may well increase your risk of cervical cancer rather than reduce it, the live polio vaccine has also been found to cause polio. And, in rare instances the virus in the vaccine has even been known to mutate into a much deadlier version. As reported by MSN News in 2009, genetic analysis has proven such mutated viruses have caused at least seven separate outbreaks in Nigeria.

According to the CDC the last case of wild polio in the US—meaning polio caused naturally and not due to the live polio vaccine—occurred in 1979. From 1980 through 1999, there were NO wild polio cases in the US. Instead we had 144 cases of vaccine-associated paralytic polio (VAPP) caused by live oral polio vaccine.

Polio outbreaks in Haiti and the Dominican Republic in 2002 were also traced back to a strain of oral polio vaccine (OPV) that mutated back to virulence.

According to a report by Neil Z. Miller of the Global Vaccine Institute, the live polio virus from the vaccine can remain in your throat for one to two weeks and in your feces for up to two months. So not only is the vaccine recipient at risk, but he or she can potentially spread the disease to others.

In 1999, the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) recommended that the United States replace the live-virus vaccine with an inactivated “killed” virus vaccine, which is what remains in use today. However, the inactivated polio virus vaccine has not been without its share of serious side effects either.

Rotavirus Vaccine Contaminated with Pig Virus

Last year, the US FDA suspended the rotavirus vaccine Rotarix after an independent lab discovered it was contaminated with “a substantial amount” of DNA from the porcine circovirus. In pigs, this virus causes poor growth, weight loss, weakness, enlarged lymph nodes, skin rashes, difficulty breathing, jaundice, stomach ulcers, and sudden death.

As expected, both the FDA and GlaxoSmithKline spokespeople stated that the contaminated Rotarix vaccine carried no known human health risks. However, this is easy to say since there are no studies to confirm or deny a link between these viruses and human disease.

In the case of the polio vaccine, the link between the SV40 virus and human cancer wasn’t discovered until 40 years later! It is actually surprisingly common for vaccines to contain various animal matter, including foreign animal tissues containing genetic material (DNA/RNA).

Once the Rotarix contamination was discovered, new technology was used to test eight infectious attenuated viral vaccines, and in addition to Rotarix, two others contained “unexpected viral sequences”:

A measles vaccine was found to contain low levels of the retrovirus avian leukosis (AVL) virus—a virus known to cause cancer in chickens. This despite the fact that vaccine manufacturers have been required to use eggs from leucosis-free stocks for over 40 years.Rotateq, Merck’s rotavirus vaccine, was found to contain a virus similar to simian (monkey) retrovirus—the SV40 virus previously linked to human cancer.Are you willing to bet that they a) know what they’re talking about, and b) are telling the whole truth and nothing but the truth about the potential health dangers of all these vaccines?

HPV Vaccine Now Routine for Boys as Well…

So far, very few parents have voluntarily lined up their sons for the HPV vaccine, but that may soon change. As reported by Paging Dr. Gupta, the American Academy of Pediatrics’ 2011 schedule of recommended routine vaccines for children and teens now includes the HPV vaccine for boys aged 9-18 as well.

Folks, this is a disaster in the making. I shudder to think about the statistics we’ll see in a few years if parents fall for this nonsense.

I urge you to consider the risks already revealed in the four short years since Gardasil came on the market. Already, there are close to 21,000 reported incidents of adverse effects and death, despite the fact that only two out of every 10 women in the approved age group have gotten the vaccine so far.

Add to this the fact that an estimated 90 to 99 percent of all adverse effects are never reported, and the abnormally large risks of the HPV vaccine compared to other vaccines should give most people reason to pause.

Although the FDA ultimately dismisses all side effects, including deaths, as being within the norm, even they have stated that:

“In VAERS, a higher proportion of Gardasil reports were of syncope [fainting] and VTEs [venous thromboembolic events] compared with other vaccines.”

And according to the National Vaccine Information Center, the incidents of miscarriage and still birth events from Gardasil supersede the same event from all other vaccinations.

According to a recent Sane Vax press release on PR Log:

“There is no doubt the vaccine’s safety and efficacy has not been thoroughly investigated. And independent investigation on the safety and efficacy of the HPV vaccines, Gardasil and Cervarix must be conducted before there are more injuries and deaths.”

What’s most frustrating about this is that not a single one of these 21,000 children and young women needed to be harmed or die.

Why?

There are still outstanding questions about whether HPV is or is not the direct cause of cervical cancer. The FDA knows there are many other co-factors involved with the development of cervical cancer, and as of 2003 acknowledged that “most infections (by HPV) are short-lived and not associated with cervical cancer.” The same news release also states that “with proper screening, cervical cancer is avoidable, and if caught early, curable.”

In essence, three years before the HPV vaccine came upon the scene, they knew that what was needed—if anything—was simply improved screening methods, such as regular pap smear testing for girls and women that are far less risky than getting an HPV shot.

Interestingly, and disturbingly, routine pap smears have DECLINED, coinciding neatly with the release of the HPV vaccine. Between 2007 and 2010, cervical cancer screening rates declined by nearly 7 percent, the New York Times reported in December of last year.

When you consider that the HPV vaccine increases your risk of cancer if you’re already infected with certain types of HPV, this is a double-whammy of bad news since rarely, if ever, are girls and women given HPV pap screening before they get an HPV shot.

It’s all madness! Not only is the HPV vaccine is one of the most unnecessary vaccines on the market, it is also the most dangerous! And now they want to unleash it on young boys, and they’re trying to get it approved for older women as well.

Weighing Benefits versus Risks

Even without a potential contamination scare, there are serious risks to every vaccine. The HPV vaccine is a perfect example. So before vaccinating you really need to be certain that the benefits will outweigh those risks.

In the case of Rotarix, along with RotaTeq (a similar vaccine made by Merck), the benefits are very questionable, especially if you live in the United States or another developed country. Typically, when a child in the United States contracts rotavirus, and most do in infancy and early childhood, all that is required is lots of rest, good nutrition and plenty of fluids to prevent dehydration from diarrhea. This infection also provides natural immunity that will protect your child for life.

Along with showing little benefit for a disease that is typically entirely treatable with fluids and rest, a recent drug review by the FDA found that Rotarix is associated with an increase in pneumonia-related deaths in children, compared to a placebo.

So with this particular vaccine, children living in developed countries like the US are potentially taking on serious risks with what appears to be very little benefit — and that was before the contamination was uncovered.

In the case of the HPV vaccine (Gardasil and Cervarix) the choice is clear. It has a high rate of risk and the potential benefits are unproven:

In more than 70 percent of cases, HPV clears up on its own within a few weeks or months. In over 90 percent of cases, it’s gone within two years, causing no symptoms or disease.Only about 26 percent of girls and women ages 14 to 59 have been exposed to any HPV strain at all; andOnly 2 percent have been exposed to strains 16 or 18 – the two that Gardasil and Cervarix protect against – meaning this vaccine is completely unnecessary because HPV infection very rarely leads to cancer.Women whose partners wore condoms during vaginal intercourse are 70 percent less likely to become infected with HPV. That’s a FAR greater level of protection than you can get from this vaccine! For more in-depth information about the HPV vaccine along with the top 10 reasons why you don’t need it, please see this previous article.

The moral of the story?

Do your homework before subjecting your children to any vaccine. A great way to get started is to simply use the Search Feature at the top of each of my Web pages and search my site as it contains a litany of research on vaccine safety, and the lack thereof. The National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC) also provides well-referenced information on vaccines and diseases, such as HPV, rotavirus and polio.

http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2011/02/18/leading-vaccine-doctor-states-cancer-linked-to-polio-vaccine.aspx

Big Brother is Not Only Watching You: He is Your Facebook Friend

images
These are Dangerous Times

By Fahim A. Knight-El

Facebook: the CIA, FBI, Homeland Security Agencies, state and local law enforcement agencies and the judicial systems are not waiting to ascertain and utilize this valuable and massive stored collection of data that is voluntarily being provided and ascertained from social media sites for future purposes (the strategy and tactic of immediate utilization is taking place in real time). There have been various criminal cases in the United States where Facebook accounts and social media information have been subpoena into courts of law and acquired information has been used by the government to convict people for alleged criminal misconduct. I have law enforcement friends and they tell me that the larger police departments around the country have cyberspace taskforces who principle responsibility and duty is monitoring the social networking sites. Why wouldn’t they be interested in this massive data base and the wealth of personal and private information being shared?

What makes Facebook and social networking sites valuable to the law enforcement community, is that this information is not part of a hardcore surveillance operations or some covert counterintelligence operation, but it is unsolicited information, which is voluntarily being given by Facebook users. Thus, ranging from photos (valuable identification of persons who might be a present person of law enforcement interest or perhaps a future person of interest)—this gives the government readily identification intell and based on your friends acceptance data that you have provided, it possibly broadens you’re list of family, friends and associates who also post their ‘confidential’ information on your Facebook page. It connects us to perhaps various links to people who know you and visa versa (of course most friends we accept on Facebook doesn’t fit into that category of ‘friend’—they are cyberspace strangers). We provide in other instances some of most intricate details about every aspect of our personal lives, who we are connected to in various locations and capacities, who our employer may be, what gangs, social clubs and civic organizations we may belong, who we are disputing with, etc., are routinely entered on people’s Facebook pages. People who are in domestic disputes are hiring cyberspace private investigators to find and locate incriminating data against spouses; also there are those who uses social media to commit scams in which the Nigerians are masters of cyberspace crimes—conmen exemplars. No, this isn’t data that is waiting for some future misuse or perhaps waiting to fall in the wrong person’s hands, it is too beneficial in the here and now.

I do not think that most people know and understand how serious the world we live in and the times that we are living under. Their orientation to the world is overly consumed with social mediums and they are not often engaged in anything relative to critical thinking and are not aware of the social, political and economic trends around them. They are not reading information that will heighten their conscious level and are not a part of any movements or study groups where good information is being disseminated. They do not follow the various so-called counterterrorism legislation and laws that are being enacted by Congress, U.S. Courts and by presidential executive order. Most of us do not realize that we could immediately come under the U.S. Enemy Combatant laws—where our so-called due process is stripped from us and we find themselves facing long term incarceration because of what appeared to be an innocent or not so innocent Facebook posting—image or language that allegedly compromises U.S. National Security and/or making statements in support of United States external foreign enemies as a post on Facebook; moreover, this could prove troublesome for American citizens under this new reactionary course that our government has taking.

They do not realize just like the so-called Al Qaeda terrorist that have been held in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba since the 9/11 hoax and the Iraq War; and has been legally stripped of all of their rights as prisoners of war, this could easily be any ordinary American citizen. The National Defense Authorization Act (passed by President Obama on December 31, 2011) has broadened the United States Justice Department powers and legality to place United States Citizens in off shore custody prisons and incarcerate them in places like Guantanamo Bay, which is designated throughout the world. Our young social media networking brothers and sisters (our children) are having fun and do not have a clue that there is a sinister force paying attention to their postings and they are not looking to have fun. We as parents, family and elders in the community are going to have to find better ways to get our young people properly informed about the danger of social media. If not the U.S. Patriot Act, National Defense Authorization Act, and Military Commission Act, etc., will be facing them, which is designed to feed them/us into the prison industrial complex. This is why in some of my recent Blogs, I overly stressed the importance of SHARING wisdom and Knowledge. My personal conscious journey or personal awaken started when I was a 13 year old teenager and various conscious groups and individuals helped to facilitate leading me to thinking outside the box and developing a conscious level. This eventually led me to Los Angles, California where I met Dr. Maulana Karenga and Ashra Kwesi they too helped to connect me to Pan-Africanism, Nationalism and the importance of developing an African centered mindset. It was these and other collective experiences that have had that helped to shape my worldview. The Path that I am on today is by no means coincidental, it was those experiences that led me to this time and space. I do not perceive that social media will lead our young people into developing a meaningful worldview.

I know that, I have some recent conversations with other Bloggers and outright strangers about my resistance to Facebook; I wrote this piece on Facebook last year titled, “Facebook: The New Cointelpro: What Do You Mean By No Snitching? here is the link for those who might be interested. http://fahimknightsworld.blogspot.com/20… . But I know I/We live in the age of the U.S. Patriot Act and the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) and I will be intentionally and repetitively mention these Acts throughout the Blog because of their significance relative to our civil liberty. This young generation does not know nor understand the complexity of the world we live under. Their lack of understanding can render them and even some of us ‘old heads” vulnerable, unless we fully understand that there has been a social, political, and economic paradigm shift even in how law enforcement view criminal science and we might get caught up out of sheer ignorance. I think the visible evidence relative to Facebook is clear; people are divulging huge amounts of information about themselves on this public social networking forum. I do not think that point can be argued and whether or not Zuckerberg could be covertly working in the interest of the intelligence community is questionable and perhaps debatable, But here is a the New York Times Internet article dated December 15, 2010 titled, “Person of the Year: Facebook’s Mark Zuckerburg” that raise a very interesting thought:

“The door opened, and a distinguished-looking gray-haired man burst in — it’s the only way to describe his entrance — trailed by a couple of deputies. He was both the oldest person in the room by 20 years and the only one wearing a suit. He was in the building, he explained with the delighted air of a man about to secure ironclad bragging rights forever, and he just had to stop in and introduce himself to Zuckerberg: Robert Mueller, director of the FBI, pleased to meet you.”

“They shook hands and chatted about nothing for a couple of minutes, and then Mueller left. There was a giddy silence while everybody just looked at one another as if to say, What the hell just happened?”

I think this gesture or non-gesture spoke volumes relative to FBI director Robert Mueller coming to visit Mark Zuckerberg CEO of Facebook. Thus, to me the visit could have implied that thanks to you and Facebook intelligence gathering on people have become easier and more accessible. The masses have been made blind, deaf and dumb; many are having fun and do not have a clue that they could be contributing to a covert government espionage operation, which the collection of this massive data will eventually be used against them and others by the government.

I do not think we can overlook the sinister reality of Cointelpro (FBI counterintelligence program that was enacted by J. Edgar Hoover in the 1950s-1970s) as something of the past. I am providing the forum with the Wikipedia link defining and explaining Cointelpro: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/COINTELPRO. I have actual copies of FBI documents (thanks to the Freedom of Information Act) and books on the United States Government detailing how our government illegally spied, illegally wiretapped, printed false stories in newspapers, planted agent provocateurs in leftwing and rightwing organizations, staged assassinations, created internal confusion in organizations, etc. Facebook in my opinion is a social experiment whereas people are voluntarily providing the government with their own personal dossiers (in this manner there are no compromises relative to the question of civil liberties or constitutional rights).

Although, people have choices (I think this term has been deduced to a cliché), but they are not able to combat the propaganda and disinformation campaigns and therefore, we are constantly made pawns in the game. So, I do not trust Facebook and no one can convince me that 12-30 age groups are responsibly posting and they understand all the legal and technical ramifications that could come in the play. Big Brother is no longer watching us; he has been given a formal invite and received and accepted as a Facebook “friend” just click and accept. Moreover, and start sharing.

I really do not think there was anything new relative to President Obama constructing this recently talked about memo dealing with the possibility of “Internal Treats” and how the government was going to deal with government officials who would compromise sensitive and classified information that would bring into question our national security. The Obama Administration wrote some directives of how they are going to deal with ‘Insider Threat’. I think myself and many other conscious persons over the last eleven years since 9/11 have been sounding the alarm about False Flags and the negative affect that the 9/11 hoax has had on the American people and the globe. Many of these initiatives had been put in place by President George W. Bush right after 9/11 in which he began dismantling how our government was structured based on the three levels of government, i.e., the Executive branch, Legislative branch and the Judicial branch—our government was structured this way to ensure Democracy and to add a dimension of checks and balances with the separation of powers.

Some would argue that the United States Congress, the elected officials of the people who were involved in passing the United States Patriot Act and establishing the office of Homeland Security gave the Executive Branch of government to much power (in unchecked Executive Orders, law enforcement powers, and was the Patriot Act essentially a violation of our Constitutional Rights?) and did this legislation actually upset the balance of powers we have in our three branches of government.

The Patriot Act, Anti-Terrorism Bill and other anti-Civil Rights policies gave the United States Government and the United States Department of Justice unprecedented authority; in particular over American citizens and the citizens the world-over in general. The Justice Department can now detain, conduct unwarranted searches and seizure acts (Illegally eavesdropping on private citizens without due cause), illegally arrest, concoct indictments via grand jury, seize real and personal assets, impose long term prison sentences, etc., if the government label you as a terrorist (this label could now be applied to ordinary citizens), the government has the right to treat you in any manner they deem acceptable and in many cases deny American citizens basic civil rights.

The American people have giving the United States Government this type of authority over them in the name of fighting terror. The Justice Department has developed terms such as “Enemy Combatant”, which allows them the legal ability to extradite American citizens who commit acts of terrorism and/or are in collaboration by way of a conspiracy with foreign dissidents on international soil (they even reinterpreted the Geneva Convention and rights giving to prisoners of war). They even have massive laws to deal with what the U.S. Government calls ‘Homegrown Terrorist’. The government now can use various legal and military techniques (specifically under the Military Commissions Acts of 2006) in its arsenal when it comes to so-called fighting terrorism. The have expanded the military powers of the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) to function beyond the scope of natural and manmade disasters; it now has the capability to function as a military arm who acts at the pleasure of the president and is on call just like the U.S. National Guard.

For example, wiring tapping, detaining suspected terrorist individuals without due process (violating the14th amendment), monitoring dissent activist and speeches (violating the 1st Amendment to the U.S. Constitution), monitoring suspected violators banking transactions by expanding the powers of the United States Treasury Department. But many view this massive legislation, legal, and law enforcement build up and guidelines giving under the Patriot Act as being essential and necessary in the United States efforts to fight and combat terrorism and to secure its boarders and secure its international interest in the area of foreign policy and national security.

The Patriot Act redefined how immigration would be viewed and in the name of National Security and as a result, many new offices were founded and existing law enforcement office (FBI, CIA, ICE, DEA, ATF, IRS, INS, federal, local and state law enforcement agencies, federal, state, and local courts) were giving expansive authority in the name of so-called making the American people safer in this era of fighting terrorism. Thus, perhaps in doing so the question that remains is, did we compromise too much of our civil liberties in allowing the passing of the Patriot Act in 2001 and the Anti-Terrorism Bill and the Military Commission Act just as the citizens did in 1798 allowing the passing of the Sedition Acts?

The conservative Talking Heads appears to continually overlook the massive reactionary Executive Orders and legislation and laws that Bush enacted during his tenure that has brought us to this space and time. Bush and his administration waged some of the greatest assaults on American’s civil liberties under the guise of the U.S. Patriot Act and under the Office of Homeland Security. So to lay this Big Brother and eroding of American civil liberties totally on President Barack Obama is a little disingenuous, but no doubt he has been as equally and or if not more dangerous than President George W. Bush. But make no mistake about this, Obama’s policies are only a continuation of what Bush started, which was a war on the American people.

The former Governor of Minnesota Jesse Ventura wrote about the False Flags and war against the civil liberties of the American people in his book titled, “American Conspiracies: Lies, Lies, and More Dirty Lies that the Government Tells Us”. So I think some of these pundits have hidden ulterior motives and many of them backed Bush in 2001 because they were duped into believing that we were at war with Islam and that Bush Doctrine (either you are with us or against us) had a motive of ridding the world of the “Axis of Evil” and crushing the so-called “Rogue Nations” thus, this type language was the epitome of Western imperialism. Americans applauded that we had attacked the defenseless nation of Iraq and Saddam Hussein and never thought twice that they were putting Executive Orders and laws in place to attack the ordinary American citizen.

The 9/11 hoax was used to compromise the United States Constitution and to strip the American people of any constitutional rights that were guaranteed to protect us as U.S. Citizens. They in particular wanted legal measures to offset our right to due process under the law (set forth in the 14th Amendment). They used fear and scare tactics to get us to accept and believe that Islamic Terrorist was coming to get us and that the Islamic so-called extremist had compromised our National Security interest. No, Bush and Barack were coming to get our assess.

Yet, we are now moving toward 2013 and 85 percent of the American people are still sleep and have no knowledge of what is going on around them (I do not feel sorry for us anymore, the handwriting has been on the wall for a very long time). President Obama in my opinion had sealed the deal with implementing the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) which has given him unprecedented and unilateral authority to bring the hammer down in any direction that he chooses. It is not about defining new legal perimeters to controlling internal threats and/or espionage—those measures are already in place.

I think those of us who live in the United States probably need to care about the course of action that our government has taking, because if the notion of dissent is going to be interpreted as treason, then just the idea along violates the legal ramifications and the bases of our jurisprudence system, which is the United States Constitution and will continue to give more way to the undermining of our Civil Liberties and our so-called basic rights granted to us as American citizens. Now, if we accepted the overall mood of our nation, it doesn’t have any real political enthusiasm and/or gives us any optimism to resist. But those of us who live inside the United States of America should care because of the reactionary and dangerous public policy that has been enacted against the freedoms of the American people since 9/11. I think it is our God given right, as well as our constitutional right to continue to advocate and fight for Freedom, Justice and Equality. So, I disagree with those who desire to be silent and passive and not demonstrate dissent: I do not have far to look when it comes to justifying my disagreement and position with those who choose to be apolitical: Here once again are a few examples that should have all of us alarmed: The U.S. Patriot Act, National Defense Authorization Act, Military Commission Act, Anti Terrorism Act, that you are well aware, etc., and there are many more Executive Orders and Judicial legislation that has already been enacted against the American people. And eventually no one will be safe any place in the world.

David Icke Stated: “The human mind is the ‘stadium’ in which the global conspiracy is being played out minute by minute every day. That’s the biggest prize of all for the Control System – to dictate what we think and so how we behave and perceive self and the world.”

“Yes, you can control people physically in some situations if you have enough uniforms to do so, but you can’t do that en masse because of the fantastic inequity in numbers between oppressor and oppressed. For the ultimate human control you need mind control.” “There are so many ways that this is being done today and conscious awareness of that is the most effective defense from these external influences targeting the individual and collective psyche …”

What gives the Hidden Hand and the Invisible Rulers power and authority over humanity is their ability to implore various strategies and tactics such as subliminal seduction. The dumbing down process in reality is so overwhelming and yet we believe that we have “Freewill”, but we are often unconscious active participants in our own duping and very few have demonstrated the intelligence or discipline to exercise the type of Will that might have halted this neo-servitude status in which we find presently confronting all of humanity.

I do not think the freewill theory holds up when you look historically and presently at humanity’s active participation in their own demise. Yes we have choices, but even the choices have been systematically and covertly arranged for us where the outcome is already predetermined to benefit the status quo often to the detriment of the individual and society at-large. I know people think they have the right to exercise freewill, but that doesn’t mean they even understand some of the choices and decisions that they make. I also, know that there are many in Blog Sphere who are very informed but being informed (is not a light weight disposition) is not the rule, but the exception to the rule. Thus, the majority of society functions from a position of ignorance

Perhaps the largest population who is engaged in the social network site of Facebook is between the ages of 12-30—however the ages of Facebook users have considerably expanded in the last decade to a much larger demographic. However, the younger users have not acquired enough life experience and have not studied alternative perspectives to even know that covert danger could be lurking under the guise of Facebook and social networking. I just do not know, if they understand the principles associated with freewill versus naively and innocently dispersing personal and private information with little understanding of the possible negative backlash or consequences. Many full aged adults cannot adequately and responsible arrive at a happy medium relative to how much information should be shared on a public social networking forum.

Fahim A. Knight, Chief Researcher for keeping it Real Think Tank located in Durham, NC; our mission is to inform African Americans and all people of goodwill, of the pending dangers that lie ahead; as well as decode the symbolism and reinterpreted the hidden meanings behind those who operate as invisible forces, but covertly rules the world. We are of the belief that an enlightened world will be better prepared to throw off the shackles of ignorance and not be willing participants for the slaughter. Our MOTTO is speaking truth to power. Fahim A. Knight-EI can be reached at fahimknight@ yahoo.com.

Stay Awake Until We Meet Again,
Fahim A. Knight-El

THE NEW POPE AND THE NEW WORLD ORDER: THE CONCLAVE’S NEW KING

Posted on March 21, 2013 by Evan Batterton |

Written by Evan Batterton

DID THE FALSE PROPHET AND FUTURE LEADER OF THE ILLUMINATI ONE WORLD CHURCH OR A HUMBLE MAN BECOME THE MOST POWERFUL RELIGIOUS ICON?

It’s March the 13th 2013 and the conclave has just voted for, and revealed to the world the new Pontiff and leader of the 1.2 billion member Catholic Church. Cardinal Jorge Mario Bergoglio became the 266th Pope of the Church and the 112th and final Pope in the Prophecy of Saint Malachy who nicknamed the final Pope “Petrus Romanus” or Peter the Roman, and by now most of us know that he took the name P Francis. I watched this intently because I am a former Catholic and New World Order watch dog, and I think we all know that the Illuminati, Their Corruption, and Gnostic Luciferianism is alive and well in the Vatican. There are some facts and some firsts that need to be discussed about the Church, Francis’ past, his new name, the Saint Malachy Prophecy, and much more.

HERE ARE A FEW FUN FACTS ABOUT THE NEW “HOLY FATHER.”

The new Pontiff and Head of State for Vatican City, Pope Francis was born in Buenos Aries, Argentina. This of course makes him a Latin American and most of the Catholic population is Hispanic and located in Latin America, in fact roughly 46% of the 1.2 billion Catholics are located in Latin America. He took the name Francis, and that name has never been taken before as a Papal name. The media are calling him the first non-European Pope. He is the very first Jesuit Pope. He was not believed to be a front-runner and was an unexpected winner according to the media and the mainstream coverage has been abysmal.

IT’S TIME TO FACT CHECK AND GET NITTY-GRITTY WITH POPE FRANCIS.

The New Pope is Italian by ethnicity. His father was an Italian immigrant and mainstream media is mentioning this in passing, yet the keep pressing that he is an Argentinean. He’s 76 years old, getting ready to turn 77 and his middle name is Mario. Come on; think about it, his middle name is Mario. In conclusion to this part, Pope Francis is an Argentina National but he is an ethnic Italian.

THE IMPORTANCE AND SYMBOLISM OF A PAPAL NAME IS IMMENSE

As far as Papal names go, this is the first time in the history of the Catholic Church that a Pontiff has chosen the name Francis, and there are things that need to be addressed as it concerns the reasoning behind him picking Francis. Francis, like the name Peter was a name that was considered off-limits because of Francis being such a singular and important character and Peter for obvious reasons because biblically he was the closest to Jesus Christ and according to Catholic Catechism Peter was the very first Pope and all that follow are his descendants. The problem with Francis being a taboo and off-limits is due to the character’s singularity (according to the media yet again), but Francis is not a singular figure. First of all, which Francis was Cardinal Jorge even talking about? The mainstream media keeps saying the most significant “first” is his selection of taking the name of Francis of Assisi (Born Francesco Di Pietro (Peter) Di Bernardone) . Saint Francis of Assisi was and still is an interesting character.

Saint Francis of Assisi was not his original name. He was born Francesco Di Pietro (Peter) Di Bernardone (interesting) and was never a priest, however he was a friar and a preacher and he became synonymous with poverty and the vows of poverty because he joined in a begging protest at the St. Peter’s Basilica prompting him to lead a purposefully poor life despite coming from a very wealthy family. He led a very busy life and even attempted to convert the Sultan to put an end to the Crusades. Like the Benedictine Monks, Francis was given an order of his own and after having his community granted to him in 1224, the most peculiar thing happened to him; Francis of Assisi became the very first recorded individual to undergo Stigmata (spontaneously experiencing some or all of the wounds of Jesus). Pope Gregory made him Saint Francis of Assisi on July 16th, 1228 and he had passed away prior to that on Oct. 3rd 1226. His patronage is important to focus on considering this is the man the mainstream media is trying so hard to convince us that Jorge Mario Bergoglio has now become. Saint Francis is the patron saint of animals and the environment which isn’t a bad thing but, and this is important in relation to the prophecy, he is also one of two patron saints of Italy. Catholics and Christians alike need to be made aware of certain pagan aspects introduced by this revered Saint. New Age followers, Wicca practitioners, and other pagans may see no problem, but biblically things like this are strictly forbidden and there are so many illustrations that I’m only going to give a few examples: his sorrow for the Stations of the Cross; he created the nativity scene for Christmas which is simply a pagan sun worship day; every October the 4th on his “Feast Day” the churches hold rituals to bless animals, and he also wrote a work titled, “Canticum Fratris Solis or Laudes Creaturarum,” and that translates into Canticle of the Sun. There’s no denying the flagrant paganism, which, I’m not bashing, but any intelligent person will see what I’m attempting to demonstrate here.

Now, moving right along to Saint Francis Xavier and we have our proof that the mainstream media is trying to turn the Pope into a teddy bear, a pagan teddy bear, but a teddy bear nonetheless. The single most important thing to know about Francis Xavier in this work is that he is the co-founder of the Society of Jesus, which is better known and feared in the world of the “Awakened” as The Jesuits. A little background on this fiend reveals Spanish origins and a well-traveled man travelling to all parts of the known world. He was born on April 7th 1506 and died December 3rd 1552. Saint Ignatius Loyola mentored Francis Xavier and Xavier became one of the first 7 Jesuits that took their oaths to the society in 1534 at a place known as Montmartre which is an odd location that will become a subject later.

Xavier was made a Saint, the technical term is Canonized, by Pope Gregory the 15th and he is the Patron Saint of all Catholic Missionaries; his “Feast Day” is December 3rd. Now, to know the true nature of Francis Xavier, the new Pope Francis, and why I believe Francis Xavier is the inspiration adopted by this New World Order Italian False Prophet there must be a more intimate education of the Jesuit Order and despite the Jesuit’s massive history this can be taught swiftly and quite effectively.

THE JESUITS: THE DEADLIEST AND MOST CUNNING INTELLIGENCE ORGANIZATION EVER

The Jesuits (The Society of Jesus) literally operate like ninjas for the Pope, and I’m going to be speaking past tense a lot but one must not forget that they are still operational. They were used to spread Catholicism and control, subjugate, and rob Catholics. They’re all highly educated and take their orders from the Superior General, often called the Black Pope. The current Black Pope is Father Adolfo Nicolás and the church is still cranking out Jesuits and people with Jesuit educations (I received one). The very first initiation was dark and occult in nature. It occurred at Montmartre which is actually in Paris, a northern hill to be exact, and this place has a very interesting history. As each piece of history and fact is absorbed, the pieces must be placed in the same mental file as the new Pope Francis. His ancestors and the founders of his order were initiated at this hilltop:

-The name means Mountain of Mars.
-Bishop Dennis of Paris (Saint Dennis) was decapitated on that very hill around 250 A.C.E.
-Rumored to be an ancient Druid Gathering place but there’s no Archeological evidence.
-The Hill sits on top of Gypsum Mines
-The tooth of an ancient and extinct equine was discovered at Montmartre.

It’s now basically a vineyard that pays no taxes and as stated earlier, the first 7 Jesuits, the ancestors and founders of Jorge Mario Bergoglio (Pope Francis) Jesuit Order took their oath on this hill.

Quite the interesting location but to shed even more light on the new Pontiff we need to take a look at the various duties and missions performed over the centuries by the Jesuits and a copy of their oath absolutely has to be studied and analyzed. Once all that has been revealed I’m confident that the readers will see that CNN, CBS, FOX, and all the rest of the biased and unethical mainstream media disappointments are dead wrong about Pope Francis modeling himself after the pagan-like Saint Francis of Assisi. Jesuits took the peaceful and receptive nature of Christianity and substituted every good, pure, and loving message with each quality’s anti-thesis. For example, freewill was turned into forced conversions; the Golden Rule was substituted with torture, interrogations, assassinations, and even espionage; and the very nature of Christianity’s Monotheism and highest commandment of all to worship God the Father was changed to worship of the Catholic Church and the Papacy and this law was enforced brutally. The Pope was God’s Word and His Will; the Pope was called the Faithful’s Holy Father, and the Pope is religious royalty and the Jesuits were the lead instigators and masterminds in getting the Pope something called Papal Infallibility which means the Pope can NOT be wrong in any spiritual or legal matter, thus making him god-like, especially after the birth of their order. Our new Pope, Pope Francis, is a Jesuit, a very high-ranking Jesuit. He is the first Jesuit to ever become Pope.

ALL JESUITS, INCLUDING THE NEW PONTIFF, POPE FRANCIS, PARTICIPATE IN AN OCCULT RITUAL OF INITIATION AND SWEAR OATHS OF EVIL

This oath is bad enough on its own for anyone to swear to but after reading it again I had to ask myself what it means to the world if the man who has taken the helm of spiritual leadership of over 1.2 billion people swore and abides by this spiritual contract. The Jesuit Induction Oath can be found in a book entitled, “Subterranean Rome,” and the author was Charles Didier. This gem of a book was published in New York in 1843! The same vow is still being used and it was the same vow used at the very first initiation in 1534. Fortunately for the aware and awakened we can also find this psychotic oath in the Library of Congress, AKA the Congressional Record of the USA under House Bill 1523, Contested election case of Eugene C. Bonniwell, against Thos. S. Butler, Feb. 15, 1913, pp. 3215-3216 and the oath and ritual that the new Pope undertook on December 13th 1969 is as follows:

“When a Jesuit of the minor rank is to be elevated to command, he is conducted into the Chapel of the Convent of the Order, where there are only three others present, the principal or Superior standing in front of the altar. On either side stands a monk, one of whom holds a banner of yellow and white, which are the Papal colors, and the other a black banner with a dagger and red cross above a skull and crossbones, with the word INRI, and below them the words IUSTUM, NECAR, REGES, IMPIOUS. The meaning of which is: It is just to exterminate or annihilate impious or heretical Kings, Governments, or Rulers. Upon the floor is a red cross at which the postulant or candidate kneels. The Superior hands him a small black crucifix, which he takes in his left hand and presses to his heart, and the Superior at the same time presents to him a dagger, which he grasps by the blade and holds the point against his heart, the Superior still holding it by the hilt, and thus addresses the postulant:”

Superior speaks:

My son, heretofore you have been taught to act the dissembler: among Roman Catholics to be a Roman Catholic and to be a spy even among your own brethren; to believe no man, to trust no man. Among the Reformers, to be a reformer; among the Huguenots, to be a Huguenot; among the Calvinists, to be a Calvinist; among other Protestants, generally to be a Protestant, and obtaining their confidence, to seek even to preach from their pulpits, and to denounce with all the vehemence in your nature our Holy Religion and the Pope; and even to descend so low as to become a Jew among Jews, that you might be enabled to gather together all information for the benefit of your Order as a faithful soldier of the Pope.

You have been taught to insidiously plant the seeds of jealousy and hatred between communities, provinces, states that were at peace, and incite them to deeds of blood, involving them in war with each other, and to create revolutions and civil wars in countries that were independent and prosperous, cultivating the arts and the sciences and enjoying the blessings of peace. To take sides with the combatants and to act secretly with your brother Jesuit, who might be engaged on the other side, but openly opposed, to that with which you might be connected, only that the Church might be the gainer in the end, in the conditions fixed in the treaties for peace and that the end justifies the means.

You have been taught your duty as a spy, to gather all statistics, facts and information in your power from every source; to ingratiate yourself into the confidence of the family circle of Protestants and heretics of every class and character, as well as that of the merchant, the banker, the lawyer, among the schools and universities, in parliaments and legislatures, and the judiciaries and councils of state, and to be all things to all men, for the Pope’s sake, whose servants we are unto death.

You have received all your instructions heretofore as a novice, a neophyte, and have served as co-adjurer, confessor and priest, but you have not yet been invested with all that is necessary to command in the Army of Loyola in the service of the Pope. You must serve the proper time as the instrument and executioner as directed by your superiors; for none can command here who has not consecrated his labors with the blood of the heretic; for “without the shedding of blood no man can be saved.” Therefore, to fit yourself for your work and make your own salvation sure, you will, in addition to your former oath of obedience to your order and allegiance to the Pope, repeat after me—

The Extreme Oath of the Jesuits:

“1, _ now, in the presence of Almighty God, the Blessed Virgin Mary, the blessed Michael the Archangel, the blessed St. John the Baptist, the holy Apostles St. Peter and St. Paul and all the saints and sacred hosts of heaven, and to you, my ghostly father, the Superior General of the Society of Jesus, founded by St. Ignatius Loyola in the Pontificate of Paul the Third, and continued to the present, do by the womb of the virgin, the matrix of God, and the rod of Jesus Christ, declare and swear, that his holiness the Pope is Christ’s Vice-regent and is the true and only head of the Catholic or Universal Church throughout the earth; and that by virtue of the keys of binding and loosing, given to his Holiness by my Savior, Jesus Christ, he hath power to depose heretical kings, princes, states, commonwealths and governments, all being illegal without his sacred confirmation and that they may safely be destroyed. Therefore, to the utmost of my power I shall and will defend this doctrine of his Holiness’ right and custom against all usurpers of the heretical or Protestant authority whatever, especially the Lutheran of Germany, Holland, Denmark, Sweden, Norway, and the now pretended authority and churches of England and Scotland, and branches of the same now established in Ireland and on the Continent of America and elsewhere; and all adherents in regard that they be usurped and heretical, opposing the sacred Mother Church of Rome. I do now renounce and disown any allegiance as due to any heretical king, prince or state named Protestants or Liberals, or obedience to any of the laws, magistrates or officers.

I do further declare that the doctrine of the churches of England and Scotland, of the Calvinists, Huguenots and others of the name Protestants or Liberals to be damnable and they themselves damned who will not forsake the same.

I do further declare, that I will help, assist, and advise all or any of his Holiness’ agents in any place wherever I shall be, in Switzerland, Germany, Holland, Denmark, Sweden, Norway, England, Ireland or America, or in any other Kingdom or territory I shall come to, and do my uttermost to extirpate the heretical Protestants or Liberals’ doctrines and to destroy all their pretended powers, regal or otherwise.

I do further promise and declare, that notwithstanding I am dispensed with, to assume my religion heretical, for the propaganda of the Mother Church’s interest, to keep secret and private all her agents’ counsels from time to time, as they may entrust me and not to divulge, directly or indirectly, by word, writing or circumstance whatever; but to execute all that shall be proposed, given in charge or discovered unto me, by you, my ghostly father, or any of this sacred covenant.

I do further promise and declare, that I will have no opinion or will of my own, or any mental reservation whatever, even as a corpse or cadaver (perinde ac cadaver), but will unhesitatingly obey each and every command that I may receive from my superiors in the Militia of the Pope and of Jesus Christ.

That I may go to any part of the world withersoever I may be sent, to the frozen regions of the North, the burning sands of the desert of Africa, or the jungles of India, to the centers of civilization of Europe, or to the wild haunts of the barbarous savages of America, without murmuring or repining, and will be submissive in all things whatsoever communicated to me. (The next section is particularly disturbing and will be made to standout due to its importance)

I furthermore promise and declare that I will, when opportunity present, make and wage relentless war, secretly or openly, against all heretics, Protestants and Liberals, as I am directed to do, to extirpate and exterminate them from the face of the whole earth; and that I will spare neither age, sex or condition; and that I will hang, waste, boil, flay, strangle and bury alive these infamous heretics, rip up the stomachs and wombs of their women and crush their infants’ heads against the walls, in order to annihilate forever their execrable race. That when the same cannot be done openly, I will secretly use the poisoned cup, the strangulating cord, the steel of the poniard or the leaden bullet, regardless of the honor, rank, dignity, or authority of the person or persons, whatever may be their condition in life, either public or private, as I at any time may be directed so to do by any agent of the Pope or Superior of the Brotherhood of the Holy Faith, of the Society of Jesus.

In confirmation of which, I hereby dedicate my life, my soul and all my corporal powers, and with this dagger which I now receive, I will subscribe my name written in my own blood, in testimony thereof; and should I prove false or weaken in my determination, may my brethren and fellow soldiers of the Militia of the Pope cut off my hands and my feet, and my throat from ear to ear, my belly opened and sulphur burned therein, with all the punishment that can be inflicted upon me on earth and my soul be tortured by demons in an eternal hell forever!

All of which, I, _, do swear by the Blessed Trinity and blessed Sacraments, which I am now to receive, to perform and on my part to keep inviolable; and do call all the heavenly and glorious host of heaven to witness the blessed Sacrament of the Eucharist, and witness the same further with my name written and with the point of this dagger dipped in my own blood and sealed in the face of this holy covenant.”

(He receives the wafer from the Superior and writes his name with the point of his dagger dipped in his own blood taken from over his heart.)

Superior speaks:

“You will now rise to your feet and I will instruct you in the Catechism necessary to make yourself known to any member of the Society of Jesus belonging to this rank.

In the first place, you, as a Brother Jesuit, will with another mutually make the ordinary sign of the cross as any ordinary Roman Catholic would; then one cross his wrists, the palms of his hands open, and the other in answer crosses his feet, one above the other; the first points with forefinger of the right hand to the center of the palm of the left, the other with the forefinger of the left hand points to the center of the palm of the right; the first then with his right hand makes a circle around his head, touching it; the other then with the forefinger of his left hand touches the left side of his body just below his heart; the first then with his right hand draws it across the throat of the other, and the latter then with a dagger down the stomach and abdomen of the first. The first then says Iustum; and the other answers Necar; the first Reges. The other answers Impious.” (The meaning of which has already been explained.) “The first will then present a small piece of paper folded in a peculiar manner, four times, which the other will cut longitudinally and on opening the name Jesus will be found written upon the head and arms of a cross three times. You will then give and receive with him the following questions and answers:

From whither do you come? The Holy faith.

Whom do you serve? The Holy Father at Rome, the Pope, and the Roman Catholic Church Universal throughout the world.

Who commands you? The Successor of St. Ignatius Loyola, the founder of the Society of Jesus or the Soldiers of Jesus Christ.

Who received you? A venerable man in white hair.

How? With a naked dagger, I kneeling upon the cross beneath the banners of the Pope and of our sacred order.

Did you take an oath? I did, to destroy heretics and their governments and rulers, and to spare neither age, sex nor condition. To be as a corpse without any opinion or will of my own, but to implicitly obey my Superiors in all things without hesitation of murmuring.

Will you do that? I will.

How do you travel? In the bark of Peter the fisherman.

Whither do you travel? To the four corners of the globe.

For what purpose? To obey the orders of my general and Superiors and execute the will of the Pope and faithfully fulfill the conditions of my oaths.

The Final Statement: Go ye, then, into the world and take possession of all lands in the name of the Pope. He, who will not accept him as the Vicar of Jesus and his Vice-regent on earth, let him be accursed and exterminated.”

THE BURNING QUESTION: DOES POPE FRANCIS SATISFY THE CRITERIA TO BECOME “PETER THE ROMAN?”

Being a Jesuit was a huge requirement to satisfy this prophecy and validate him as the False Prophet of the New World Order. The name “Petrus Romanus” implies in the prophecy that he will reassert the supreme authority of the Papacy over the entire planet prior to destroying Rome and being judged. The whole point of the Jesuit Order was to stop the spread of anything, especially Protestantism that would take power away from the Catholic Church and Rome. Also, his Papal name of Francis is huge because if he took the name to personify either of the saints or just Francis of Assisi then this is an open and shut case. Assisi was Italian ethnically and nationally and prior to changing his name his birth name was Francesco Di Pietro (Peter) Di Bernardone. That translates almost literally to Peter the Roman.

Even the less significant evidence screams a fulfilled prophecy! All Pontiffs are considered the descendants of Peter and even President Obama congratulated him with phrase included stating, “You ascend to the Throne of St. Peter,” and as a Jesuit the final set of questions in the initiation reveals that Pope Francis, “Travels in the bark of Peter the Fisherman.” That is powerful symbolism. The only way for the prophecy could have been any more blatant is if his actual name was Peter or he took the Papal name of Peter.

IS THIS THE CONCLUSION? AM I DONE DISCUSSING THIS MAN AND THE VATICAN?

Probably not because novels can be written and have been written about the evil of the Jesuits alone, throw in the study of the Saint Malachy Prophecy, Francis of Assisi, Francis Xavier and the pastoral career of Pope Francis and the sky is the limit. I just felt that it was incredibly important to counteract this mainstream grandfatherly type figure that is being presented and repeated over and over again. Every other sentence literally was Francis of Assisi and how that was the most important detail of this conclave and repetition like that is brainwashing fundamentals to the uninitiated, but to the awakened and the groggy its amateur stage magic at best. We pick up on what the media fails to mention quite easily.

The buzz and hype about his name is another obvious ploy to make him look “grandfatherly” as I heard one CNN contributor refer to him as. How can the media justify barely justify touching on the fact that Pope Francis is a Jesuit and Saint Francis Xavier was a co-founder of the Jesuits? They’re trying to make it look as if by choosing a certain name he then becomes possessed by the original owner. It’s very bizarre when sufficient thought is given to the subject. Anderson Cooper and the goons at CNN kept referring to him as being both an unexpected winner and the first non-European to become Pope. That is really piss-poor journalism and even just using vulgarity and being greener than Kermit the Frog in the Journalistic Realm I still believe my assessment was fair. First off, to say he was unexpected is so untrue that it borders on poor reporting and being an outright lie. He finished a close 2nd to Cardinal Ratzinger in the last Papal Conclave and being the first non-European is erroneous as well because if Catechism dictates the Apostle Peter as the first Pope of the Roman Catholic Church then Peter was a non-European as well and that’s just one example, and also another similarity between Francis and Peter.

There are two sure things that I realize as I am closing this out. The first is that there is a very popular conspiracy theory that the Jesuits are the true power and control the entire world and at the very least the Vatican with the “Black Pope,” Adolfo Nicholas leading, and although I’m very skeptical about the Jesuits holding all the power that the New World Order wields it can’t be denied that the Vatican is now squarely under the control of the Jesuits for the first time ever. My second and final thought for now is this topic will definitely need a companion piece written for it because there is still so much research to be done and it has not even been 24 hours yet since he was announced and I finished this main content. His alleged involvement in a kidnapping; Operation Condor and the human rights violations accusations; his top tier ranking in the Jesuit Order, and some discussion on his future role in the last few innings New World Order game.

The Banality of Evil

images
From the book , “Triumph of the Market”

by Edward S. Herman

The concept of the banality of evil came into prominence following the publication of Hannah Arendt’s 1963 book Eichmann in Jerusalem: A Report on the Banality of Evil, which was based on the trial of Adolph Eichmann in Jerusalem. Arendt’s thesis was that people who carry out unspeakable crimes, like Eichmann, a top administrator in the machinery of the Nazi death camps, may not be crazy fanatics at all, but rather ordinary individuals who simply accept the premises of their state and participate in any ongoing enterprise with the energy of good bureaucrats.

Normalizing the Unthinkable

Doing terrible things in an organized and systematic way rests on “normalization.” This is the process whereby ugly, degrading, murderous, and unspeakable acts become routine and are accepted as “the way things are done.” There is usually a division of labor in doing and rationalizing the unthinkable, with the direct brutalizing and killing done by one set of individuals; others keeping the machinery of death (sanitation, food supply) in order; still others producing the implements of killing, or working on improving technology (a better crematory gas, a longer burning and more adhesive napalm, bomb fragments that penetrate flesh in hard-to-trace patterns). It is the function of defense intellectuals and other experts, and the mainstream media, to normalize the unthinkable for the general public. The late Herman Kahn spent a lifetime making nuclear war palatable (On Thermonuclear War, Thinking About the Unthinkable), and this strangelovian phoney got very good press. ~

In an excellent article entitled “Normalizing the unthinkable,” in the Bulletin of Atomic Scientists of March 1984, Lisa Peattie described how in the Nazi death camps work was “normalized” for the long-term prisoners as well as regular personnel: “[P]rison plumbers laid the water pipe in the crematorium and prison electricians wired the fences. The camp managers maintained standards and orderly process. The cobblestones which paved the crematorium yard at Auschwitz had to be perfectly scrubbed.” Peattie focused on the parallel between routinization in the death camps and the preparations for nuclear war, where the “unthinkable” is organized and prepared for in a division of labor participated in by people at many levels. Distance from execution helps render responsibility hazy. “Adolph Eichmann was a thoroughly responsible person, according to his understanding of responsibility. For him, it was clear that the heads of state set policy. His role was to implement, and fortunately, he felt, it was never part of his job actually to have to kill anyone.”

Peattie noted that the head of MlT’s main military research lab in the 1960s argued that “their concern was development, not use, of technology.” Just as in the death camps, in weapons labs and production facilities, resources are allocated on the basis of effective participation in the larger system, workers derive support from interactions with others in the mutual effort, and complicity is obscured by the routineness of the work, interdependence, and distance from the results.
Peattie also pointed out how, given the unparalleled disaster that would follow nuclear war, “resort is made to rendering the system playfully, via models and games.” There is also a vocabulary developed to help render the unthinkable palatable: “incidents,” “vulnerability indexes,” “weapons impacts,” and “resource availability.” She doesn’t mention it, but our old friend “collateral damage,” used in the 1991 Persian Gulf War, came out of the nukespeak tradition.

Slavery and Racism as Routine

When I was a boy, and an ardent baseball fan, I never questioned, or even noticed, that there were no Black baseball players in the big leagues. That was the way it was; racism was so routine that it took years of incidents, movement actions, reading, and real-world traumas to overturn my own deeply imbedded bias. Historically, this was a country in which human slavery was firmly institutionalized and routinized, with abolitionists in the pre-civil war years looked upon as violent extremists by the dominant elites and masses alike in the North.

The rationalizations for slavery were remarkable. A set of intellectuals arose in the South before 1860 that not only defended slavery, but argued its moral superiority on the grounds of its service to the slaves, to the disadvantage of the enslaving Whites! Stephen Jay Gould’s The Mismeasure of Man, … is a superb account of how U.S. science at the highest levels constructed and maintained a “scientific” case for racism over many decades by mainly innocent and not consciously contrived scientific charlataury. The ability to put aside cultural blinders is rare. And it appears that what money and power demand, science and technology will provide, however outrageous the end.

Mainstream history has also successfully put Black slavery and oppression in a tolerable light. A powerful article by the late Nathan I. Huggins, “The Deforming Mirror of Truth: Slavery and the Master Narrative of American History, ” in the Winter 1991 issue of the Radical History Review, shows well how the “master narrative” in historiography has normalized Black slavery and post-1865 racism. Slavery was a “tragic error” (like the Vietnam War), rather than a rational and institutional choice; it has been marginalized as an aside or tangent, rather than recognized as a central and integral feature of U.S. history; and it has been portrayed as an error in process of rectification in a progressive evolution, rather than a terrible permanent scar that helps explain the Southern Strategy, the current attack on affirmative action, and the enlarging Black ghetto disaster of today.

Profits end Jobs in Death

Normalization of the unthinkable comes easily when money, status, power, and jobs are at stake. Companies and workers can always be found to manufacture poison gases, napalm, or instruments of torture, and intellectuals will be dredged up to justify their production and use. The rationalizations are hoary with age: government knows best, ours is a strictly defensive effort, or, if it wasn’t me somebody else would do it. There is also the retreat to ignorance, real, cultivated, or feigned. Consumer ignorance of process is important. Dr. Samuel Johnson avowed that we would kill a cow rather than forego eating meat, but visits to slaughterhouses have made quite a few people into vegetarians. A cover story of Newsweek some years ago, illustrating U.S. consumption of meat by showing livestock walking into a human mouth, elicited many protests-people don’t like to be reminded that steaks are obtained from slaughtered animals; they like to imagine that they are manufactured in factories, possibly out of biomass.

The bureaucratization of the use of animals for human ends is a large and controversial subject, but the potential for abuse is continuously realized as stock raisers, slaughterhouses, trappers, the Pentagon, the Animal Damage Control Agency, chemical, medical and cosmetic researchers, and academic entrepreneurs search for ways to improve the bottom line or fill in niches of “knowledge” that somebody will pay for. At the University of Pennsylvania a few years ago there was a Head Injury Lab, funded by the government, in which baboons were subjected to head injuries in the alleged interest of helping us (i.e., creatures with souls, the culmination of the evolutionary process, and the realization of the purpose of the cosmos). The lab was invaded by People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA), who among other things took away some records and films. The documentary which PETA made out of these materials, which showed these intelligent creatures having their heads smashed and rendered into zombies, also gave clear evidence that official rules of treatment of lab animals were violated, and, most important, that the participants’ attitudes toward the animals were insensitive and ugly. It was not hard to think of death camps watching the documentary of this lab in action. Yet the scientific community at Penn not only defends the use of animals against outside critics with passion and apparent unanimity, but has never to my knowledge admitted in public that the Head Injury Lab got out of hand.

In building weapons, contractors and the Pentagon have become quite sophisticated in spreading business over many states, to reach a critical mass of jobs, profits and legislators/media by congressional district to maximize the lobbying base for funding. Jobs are jobs, whether building schools or Peacekeeper Missiles or cutting down thousand-year-old redwood trees. I was slightly nauseated during the Vietnam War era by Boeing ads soliciting workers for its helicopter plant, touting itself as an “equal opportunity employer (EOE).” Maybe the Dachau camp management was also an EOE, for jobs that needed to be done and for which there was an effective demand.

Normalizing Shooting Human Fish in the Persian Gulf Barrel

In the Persian Gulf War of 1991 Uncle Sam was an EOE, and our boys and girls over there were doing their assigned jobs, repelling naked aggression in another Operation Just Cause. The war was forced upon us by Saddam Hussein’s rejection of the UN’s and “allies” insistence that he disgorge Kuwait, much as Bush “plainly” did not want war (Anthony Lewis).

Having made it Operation Just Cause No. 17, and a game with winners and losers, we could reasonably root for us-the moral force-to win. We were also defending Kuwait, and if once again the party being “saved” was “destroyed,” well, this was not our fault. Besides, there is the “principle,” of non-aggression, to which we are utterly devoted.

The media could thus focus on our brave boys, girls, generals, and officials to tell us all about their plans, moves, reactions, and miscellaneous thoughts. We could watch them in action as they took off, landed, ate, joked, and expressed their feelings on the enemy, weather, and folks back home in the Big PX. They were part of an extended family, doing a dirty job, but with clean bombs and with the moral certainty of a just cause.

The point was not often made that the enemy was relatively defenseless, and in somewhat the same position as the “natives” colonized, exterminated, and enslaved by the West in past centuries by virtue of muskets and machine guns … Our technical superiority reflected our moral superiority. If it all seemed like shooting human fish in a barrel, one must keep in mind that we were dealing with lesser creatures (grasshoppers, two-legged animals, cockroaches), people who don’t value life as much as we do, who allowed “another Hitler” to rule over them, and who stood in our way.

One of the effects of high-tech warfare, as well as the exclusive focus on “our” casualties, plus censorship (official and self), is that the public is spared the sight of burning flesh. That enemy casualties were given great prominence during the Vietnam War is one of the great, and now institutionalized, myths of that era. Morley Safer’s showing a GI applying a cigarette lighter to a Vietnamese thatched hut is used and referred to repeatedly as illustrating media boldness at that time because other cases would be hard to find. It caused CBS and Safer a lot of trouble (and he has been trying to make up for this sin ever since). Enormous government pressure and flak from other sources caused the media to provide grisly photos of enemy victims only with the greatest caution, and very infrequently, especially in light of the grisly reality. Capital intensive warfare in itself makes for distancing the public from the slaughter of mere gooks and Arabs. This is helpful in normalizing the unspeakable and unthinkable.

On February 5, 1991, the Philadelphia Inquirer carried an Associated Press dispatch by Alexander Higgins, “Marriage finds new expression in gulf: Honey, pass the bombs.” It is a little romance of a newly married couple, located at an air base in Saudi Arabia-and therefore regrettably obliged to sleep in separate tents-whose function is to load bombs on A-10 attack jets. It is a personal interest story, of two people and their relationship, with a job to do, in an unromantic setting. A fine study in the routinization of violence, of the banality of evil and the ways it is impressed on the public.

(In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. Information Clearing House has no affiliation whatsoever with the originator of this article nor is Information Clearing House endorsed or sponsored by the originator.)

Ain’t Nobody Gonna Like This One!

bible56

What you think you know about Christianity is a lie. The gospels we use now are “rehashed” Roman Empire propaganda, not the pure word of Christ.

As much of Christ’s real words as possible were destroyed.

The real Gospels, Nag Hammadi, Thomas, Magdalene, some from the Dead Sea Scrolls, never to be released or translated, kept like nuclear secrets, Christianity today is a game.

The real Christian world is the Middle East. The first real Christians were from Palestine, all Jews who converted. Very few Jews left Palestine, there is no record of it, no “exodus” to the remote areas of the Roman Empire to live among the Visigoths in 200AD.

This is cartoon religion and less than cartoon history.

Christianity in the Western Empire, Rome, Britain, Gaul, disappeared. It first returned with St. Patrick in Ireland and Irish monks returned Christianity to what we call Britain, France and even Italy.

There was no pope in Rome. There was no Rome. Go there. It had been taken down stone by stone, abandoned, no water, no food supply, nothing left.

The Visigoths visit Rome to do their thing

Ninety five percent of the world’s Christians lived in the Middle East, Judea or Palestine, Turkey, Syria, Egypt, Ethiopia, Jordan, Syria, Iraq and Persia. For hundreds of years there was no Muslim religion.

Another unpleasant secret. Mohamed the Prophet reformed the Jewish religion, believed Christ to be a primary Prophet of Islam and established his religion on totally Jewish roots but accepting Christ and his teachings as paramount.

Read this at: http://www.adeadlymisunderstanding.com.

The real pope was the Bishop of Jerusalem but the power of the church increasingly moved to Constantinople, into the hierarchy of the Roman Empire who rewrote religion into politics, threw out holy writings and created a political religion that was designed to meld easily into the cacophony of Roman and Greek mythology, the many gods.

Didn’t Solomon worship many gods? When someone says “hold no other gods above me,” they are polytheistic, not monotheistic. To the Romans, Jupiter was the head god, to Solomon, Yahweh was, to the Greeks it was Jove.

To the Danes it was Odin.

The Twelve Trips

Sorry kids, but these were all polytheistic religions, especially Judaism. The issue was which god was in charge, not how many gods.

The other issue was “graven images” or worshiping animal shapes and pictures. Jews and Muslims are iconoclasts, they don’t do photos with god or the prophets.

The issue, of course, is that, when reviewing the holy books, there is mention of a messiah. Was it Christ? Christians say yes. Jews say Christ lives in “piss and shit” while Muslims believe he was a great prophet.

What reality is, we never are told. There were two Roman empires, one real one, the Eastern one, Greek, Christian after Constantine, somewhat Christian at least.

Constantine would have appointed himself god or at least pope if he had been able to get away with it. He was one of the great liars of all time.

The west was gone, destroyed by the barbarians, nothing remained. There were early Jewish settlements in France but Jews who worshiped Christ and built churches. These became the Cathars and were killed in the holocaust of the Albigensian Crusade. Read about them in something other than the Da Vinci Codes.

Magdalene died in France, according to those there, mother of Christ’s children, wife of Christ and founder of the Church. Millions of Catholics believe this and believe she is the real “Mary.”

Go to Spain or Southern France and learn of Christianity where thousands of years are treated as yesterday.

To Americans who call themselves Christians, they could more appropriately be called “Paulists.” The “Apostle Paul” was never an apostle, nor was “Matthew, Mark, Luke or John.”

Constantine had the real gospels destroyed. Wonder what he didn’t like about them?

Paul was a “convenience,” he fit the Roman religion well and was chosen to be the founder of the polyglot religion that became the Christianity that Muslims rebelled against.

Oh, they didn’t tell you that?

Then there are Jews. None were left in the “Holyland.” They didn’t take the bus to Warsaw but converted to Christianity, the official religion of the empire and later, many became Muslims, accepting Mohamed as a Prophet. We call those Jews, pure Semites, “Palestinians.”

Some are Jews, very few, some are Christians but were forced to flee the “Holyland” by, well, we aren’t allow to say, and others are Muslims by converting from Christianity to a version of reformed Judaism called Islam which allows Christ to be a great Prophet.

This allows the “messiah” issue to be sidestepped.

There were a few Jews who had settled in Roman cities but those cities were gone, the numbers of Jews we don’t know and the truth about where they settled in Europe very different from what we are told.

Those that remained, I am guessing, stayed near the Mediterranean, moved to Persia and Iraq or Morocco.

This is guessing, there is NO history.

None moved to Germany and Poland and became the current “post-holocaust” settlers of Israel. There is no historical support for that.

Some say that all European Jews were coverts, Khazars who were pushed west by waves of barbarians. All of this, especially attempts at fictional racist history, is pure fabrication.

There is no real study of any of this, politics took it over 2000 years ago and it only got worse and worse.

Everything is lies now.

What is clear is this: Those who talk of religion with few exceptions are nuts. Some are great men. Very few know the difference and this has made religion a bane on mankind, or this is how I see it.

Religion will survive. It is said that the Templars intended to join the 3 religions of the Book, Christianity, Islam and Judaism, into one through a great conclave. Popes have talked about it as have others.

Instead, religion has provided “cover” for terrorism, church bombings, wars between Sunni and Shiite Muslims and Jews against the world.

I wonder how many actually believe any of it. In France, only 11% are actually Catholic. I know many who go to church in America but say it is for “the good of their business.”

Few know their religion and fewer still believe.

The attraction is there, denial of death, eternal life, seeing long lost dead friends, pets, getting back your old cars, all of this is written into fiction about religion, ghost stories, phony fables, “bible stories” with no basis whatsoever and the books themselves, some of them are pure freakishness.

What is the story today? The “Holyland” is emptied of Christians, who made up 35% of the population not that long ago. They left for 2 reasons, one being that they feel pressure from the Muslim majority among their own Semites and secondly, that they are recognized as “non Jews” in Israel and subjected to being walled off, apartheid abuses and even violence.

One point I can be clear about, it is an Israeli policy to foster violence against Christians across the Middle East and blame it on Muslims.

Then again, Christians in Lebanon and elsewhere have been discriminated against by Muslims. It is very real and continually lied about. Problem is, it is easy to exploit.

One can see great evil in religions. One of the great ironies of religion is how well Israel gets along, secretly, with the Wahhabist sect which is the most insane form of Islam. They teach that Jews and Christians are monkeys, same as Judaism, under the King Torah, teaches Jews that “goyim” are cattle to be bred and slaughtered.

People who believe this scare the hell out of me.

People who teach these things, all of them, whatever religion, are war criminals and need to be kept away from the public.

There are laws and courts that cover this but only Jews are effective at getting their way. Problem is, they also build the car bombs that blow up churches and mosques that keep the wars going and then sell “security and counter-terrorism” equipment to stop their own deeds.

They have been caught so many times, the funniest spraying swastikas on synagogues, a recruiting method of their organizations.

During WW2, Zionists joined with Hitler because they wanted him to expel Jews to Palestine where they could then kill the British occupiers.

This is in every history book, an iota of truth that stands alone.

Who is to blame? Common men of good will exist in the majority in all religions, and in a greater majority outside all religion entirely. We call that “enlightenment.”

A few profit from war and hate and love to manipulate, breed fear, stage phony acts of terrorism and this has been going on forever. Every peaceful demonstration has “agent provacateurs” ready to throw bombs, always working for the police or that mysterious “New World Order” we hear so much about.

What is the extreme message, what would Christ or Mohamed say, what would a “righteous Jew” say ?

Those who preach hate should die by the sword.

Real international law enforced by real international courts, not the “joke” ICC or the phony United Nations and the gangsters that run well over 100 nations as “elected leaders” will ever take mankind to a world of peace, understanding and plenty.

This is why oligarchy, now called “the 1%” is never called what it really is, organized crime.

It is how “they” got to choose candidates, run the police, own the courts, control the news, twist entertainment into “hate speech” and breed war and fear.

We let them.

The message, of course, is that we can stop, but only if we become educated, if and when we stop lying, when we physically remove those who work to twist our thought, breed hate and live off our blood.

I suspect that if Jesus were ever to return he would nuke the whole place. Religion, as Fr. Malachi Martin once told me, proves only one thing, Satan exists.

He said he wished it were otherwise.

——————–

Malachi Martin, former Vatican Secretary of State and a best-selling author said the fastest growing religion in the world is Satanism. According to Martin, the most vulnerable populations were Catholic Jesuits, Jews, Evangelical Christians and certain sects of Islam. Iran recognizes Satanists, those who worship or consort with “jinns” as a security threat.

Western security organizations come upon continual references to Satanism and Satanic rituals among America’s oldest and most powerful families, within the military academies and throughout the news and entertainment industry.

Most secret societies are Satanists, the groups talked about in blogs as running the world or cultivating new and more “evil” leaders. Their rituals are all Satanic, disguised behind phony tradition and “hazing.” Blood sacrifice, child murder, these are common crimes among the powerful, crimes that surfaced during the Franklin affair. Pedophiles are not the issue, Satanism is… and child kidnapping and murder in Washington, is known of and accepted by all in government.

Does this explain a thing or two?

Almost all Satanists attend regular worship as Christians, Muslims and Jews, the use of “cover” a key part of their belief system.

Fr. Malachi Martin claims that many, some very powerful, some seemingly ordinary, but in numbers beyond imagination, are inhabited by demons and that religion is in denial of this.

If you meet someone “infested or possessed,” they will tell you, or could if they would, that they are the rational ones, the enlightened, that their “god” is the only real god and that “that other guy” went on vacation long ago. This is why so many Jesuits are Satanists, like the coven here in Toledo, look into Father Gerald Miller. Try to get past the edited versions.

I mention this only in passing. When I think of Dr. Aafia, kidnapped, raped, tortured, children killed, all done by American military officers, or of the Rodriguez torture policies or the look of Bush and Cheney I have moments when I fear Martin may be right and that my own rationalism and humanism may be hiding a supernatural world of endless evil that fills our lives every day and can never be described with conventional rational beliefs.

I read the Wikipedia of former General Paul Vallely related to a defense firm today. Is this a total lie, a “hit piece” by Wikipedia or is he “one of them.” If I am wrong about religion then are most religious wrong about something else?

Related posts:

  1. Pastor Bill Hughes – Ancient & Modern Adventism – Catholic infiltration of the SDA Church [Video]
  2. BLASPHEMOUS POPE CLAIMS PROTESTANTS AREN’T PROPER CHRISTIANS
  3. ROMAN CATHOLICS’ PRAYER APPROVE FOR QUEEN’S DIAMOND JUBILEE
  4. America Will Soon Lose Its Constitution
  5. UHM – TEMPORAL POWER CONTROL OVER THE NEW HOLY ROMAN EMPIRE AND 9/11
  6. James Arrabito The Inroads of Spiritualism [Video]
  7. “Who Controls the United States of America?”
  8. The Jesuit Oath Exposed
  9. N.S.A YOUTUBE DEVIANT CENSORSHIP DESTROYS THE POPULAR UNHIVED MIND CHANNEL
  10. The Fox Catholic Nazi NIV Connection [Video]
  11. UHM: THE PAPAL PLANS FOR THE DESTRUCTION AND PHOENIX REBIRTH OF THE MIDDLE EAST
  12. The British Legal System of Mixed Common and Roman Law has been used to Enslave US(A)
  13. Saudis sing to the tune of EMPEROR JUAN CARLOS
  14. JESUIT AGENT ROWAN WILLIAMS WILL STAND DOWN IN DECEMBER
  15. UHM – IN REPLY TO LEO ZAGAMI’S INTERVIEW FROM THE 01ST APRIL 2012
  16. Knight of Malta Tony Blair (War Criminal) calls for World (Jesuit) Church
  17. UHM – JESUIT MERCHANTS RULE THE BANK OF ENGLAND + AUDIO
  18. “The Real Controllers of the USA” by Darryl Eberhart
  19. Lady Warsi looks to the POPE to bring Christianity back to Britain
  20. The True Seat of Roman Power in Great Britain

The Complete Idiot’s Guide to the New World Order

549853_363447223768724_1656732929_n

Zionist International Banker James Warburg on February 17, 1950, as he testified before the U.S. Senate. James was the son of Paul Warburg, who represented the Rothschilds when they created the Federal Reserve act at Jekyll Island in 1910. He also later formed the Council of Foreign Relations (CFR).

The One World Government

Great-Seal-460x443

NEW WORLD ORDER
Resistance will cost you!     Submission will cost you more!

The modern plan for a global government began with Freemasonry in 1390 and the Scottish Rites in 1395. The first master global plan was prepared by the Rothchilds in 1773. The implementation didn’t take shape until a man by the name of Adam Weishaupt, who had studied to be a Jesuit priest and was a Freemason, formed an organization called “The Illuminati,” on May 1, 1776. The alliance between Freemasonry and the Illuminati didn’t arise until July 16, 1782. These organizations are powerful.The common leadership behind these organizations was aware that world control would require economic control. In 1913, they were responsible for the Federal Reserve Special Act of 1913. The Federal Reserve was incorporated in December 1914 as a private corporation. The Federal Reserve is no more federal than Federal Express (nor does it have any reserves.) However, the so-called “Federal” Reserve is an important tool intended to permit a few to ultimately control the world’s monetary system. Read what these men had to say about the Federal Reserve:

Lewis T. McFadden (Chairman of the House Banking Commission, U.S. Congressman): “We have in this country one of the most corrupt institutions the world has ever known. I refer to the Federal Reserve Board and the Federal Reserve Banks, hereinafter called the Fed. They are not government institutions. They are private monopolies which prey upon the people of the U.S. for the benefit of themselves and their foreign and domestic swindlers, rich and predatory moneylenders.” McFadden died mysteriously in 1936 after three attempts on his life.• George W. Malove (U.S. Senator from Nevada): When speaking before Congress in 1957, he alluded as follows to the families that secretly own the Federal Reserve Bank and control the finances of the U.S.: “I believe that if the people of this nation fully understood what Congress has done to them over the past 49 years, they would move on Washington, they would not wait for an election.., it adds up to a preconceived plan to destroy the economic and social independence of the U.S.”

Baron M. A. Rothschild: “Give me control over a nation’s currency and I care not who makes it’s laws.” “Whoever controls the volume of money in any country is master of ALL its legislation and commerce.”

The Illuminati was also responsible for the formation of the Council on Foreign Relations (“CFR”). This organization was formed in July, 1921. The primary purposes of the CFR and the more recently established Tri-Lateral Commission are to establish a one world government. Read what these men had to say:

Zblgniew Brzeninski (National Security Advisor to Carter and four other presidents, Executive Director of the Tri-Lateral Commission): “The Technetronic era involves the gradual appearance of a more controlled society. Such a society would be dominated by an elite, unrestrained by traditional values.”• Peter Hoagland (Nebraska State Senator): On a radio program in 1983, he stated: “Fundamental, Bible-believing people do not have the right to indoctrinate their children in their religious beliefs because we, the state, are preparing them for the year 2000, when America will be part of a one world order global society and their children will not fit in.”

Carrol Quigley (deceased Bill Clinton mentor, Professor of History at Georgetown University, member of the CFR): In his book “Hope & Tragedy”, he stated: “The C.F.R. is the American Branch of a society which originated in England and believes national boundaries should be obliterated and one world role established.” In other words, the CFR’s activities are treasonous to the U.S. Constitution. They mean to put an end to the United States and make the U.S. part of their global government scheme. One only has to read their own publication, “Foreign Affairs Magazine”, to get a first hand lesson in their treachery.

Rowan Gaither (President of the Ford Foundation in 1954): “We operate here under directives which emulate from the White House… The substance of the directives under which we operate is that we shall use our grant making power to alter life in the U.S. so that we can comfortably be merged with the Soviet Union.”

James Paul Warburg (foreign agent of the Rothchild Dynasty, major player in the “Federal” Reserve Act scam): He stated on February 17, 1950 before the U.S. Senate: “We shall have world government, whether or not we like it. The only question is whether world government will be achieved by conquest or by consent.”

Henry Kissinger (Secretary of State to Nixon): He said at a Bilderberger meeting, “Today, Americans would be outraged if U.N. forces entered Los Angeles to restore order. Tomorrow they will be grateful.”

Warren Christopher (former Secretary of State under Clinton): He stated on January 25, 1993, on CNN: “We must get the NEW WORLD ORDER on track and bring the U.N. into its correct roll in regards to the U.S.” The Washington Times reported on May 12, 1996: “Secretary of State Warren Christopher has declared protection of the “global environment” to be a fundamental principle of American foreign policy. In a recent speech at Stanford University, Mr. Christopher unveiled the “Environmental Initiative for the 21st century,” an ambitious agenda of green diplomatic initiatives he intends to promote with renewed vigor throughout the world.

Mikhall Gorbachev: In November 1987, Mr. Gorbachev made the following statements to the Politburo “Gentlemen, comrades, do not be concerned about all you hear about Glasnost and Peretroika and democracy in the coming years. These are primarily for outward consumption. There will be no significant internal change within the Soviet Union, other than for cosmetic purposes. Our purpose is to disarm the Americans and let them fall asleep.” (See the following paragraph for more of Mr. Gorbachev’s intentions.)

Other organizations have been established in modern history to assist in the establishment of the new world order. The Bilderbergers were formed in 1954, as a sister organization to the CFR and with careful manipulation saw to it that Clinton was elected President. The Club of Rome is using environmental policies, and the unified protection of the worldwide environment as a force moving towards a new world order. This group has divided the world into 10 regions and has placed Mikhail Gorbachev as chairman of the World Environmental Movement from his base in San Francisco.The Tri-Lateral Commission, formed by David Rockefeller in July, 1972, and using contrived, and planned gas shortages, turned Japan into an industrial giant over night. This was done to shift money (we began buying Japanese cars faster than they could produce them) to Japan, and Europe with the end result being, lost jobs, lost technology and lost capabilities to bring down an already staggering trade deficit.

When Will One World Government Happen?The Bible does not set the date for the creation of the one world government. Rather, the Lord has a way of setting His own dates and embarrassing the date setters (recall “88 Reasons Why He Will Come in 88,” “1994,” etc.). Yet, we can observe events as they occur and return to the Bible, under the guidance of the Holy Spirit, to see just where they fit in.The move to a ONE WORLD GOVERNMENT has been carefully planned, slowly conditioning people, moving them step-by-step towards public acceptance of a one world government. We are being conditioned similar to the story of a frog in a pan of water with fire beneath it. The frog will remain in the heating pan as the water temperature rises and finally scalds the frog to death. The frog will not move, gradually becoming accustomed to the heat. And the frog is comfortable. However, if you were to throw a frog into a pan of hot water, the frog would jump out.Like the scalded frog, we have been conditioned to accept a one world government! Just read the following and let the Lord show you when or how far into it we are. The CFR publishes a very informative quarterly journal called “Foreign Affairs”. More often than not, important new shifts in U.S. policy, or highly indicative attitudes of political figures, have been telegraphed in its pages.For instance, the April 1974 issue of Foreign Affairs carried a very explicit recommendation for carrying out the world government scheme of CFR founder Edward Mandell House. Authored by State Department veteran and Columbia University Professor Richard N. Gardner (himself a member), “The Hard Road to World Order”, admits that a single leap into world government by an organization like the U.N. is unrealistic. Instead Gardner urged the continued piecemeal delivery of national sovereignty to a variety of international organizations. He called for “an end run around national sovereignty, eroding it piece by piece.” He named as organizations to accomplish his goal the International Monetary Fund, The World Bank, the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, the Law of the Sea Conference, the World Food Conference, the World Population Conference, disarmament programs, and a United Nations military force. This approach, Gardner said, “can produce some remarkable concessions of sovereignty that could not be achieved on an across-the-board basis.”The NAFTA Agreement, as well as many other agreements, are solidifying North America as 1 of 10 world regions. Could these be the 10 horns of Revelation 17:12-4:
“And the ten horns which thou sawest are ten kings, which have received no kingdom as yet; but receive power as kings one hour with the beast. These have one mind, and shall give their power and strength unto the beast. These shall make war with the Lamb, and the Lamb shall overcome them: for he is Lord of lords, and King of kings: and they that are with him are called, and chosen, and faithful.”Professor Gardner’s preference for destroying the freedom and independence of the U.S. in favor of the CFR’s goal of world government may thoroughly dominate top circles in our nation today. Yet the end of these attempts is written in God’s eternal word. Still, the men who would scrap the United States Constitution are praised as “progressives” and “farsighted thinkers.” The only question that remains among these powerful insiders is which method to use to carry out their treasonous plan. But, even that question is no mystery to our Lord.

Who Will be In Charge of One World Government?

Yes! America is being affected and will be more so. We are a nation that was founded on Godly principles. However, as the nation of Israel did many times, we have taken up wicked ways and judgment is on the way. The scripture says of whom much is given, much is required (Luke 12:48). God is going to require much of us, for He has indeed blessed us!


NEW WORLD ORDER – ONE WORLD GOVERNMENT – ONE WORLD RELIGION

“Behind the ostensible government sits enthroned an invisible government owing no allegiance and acknowledging no responsibility to the people.”
Theodore Roosevelt (April 19, 1906)
(Theodore Roosevelt: An Autobiography, 1913, p. 594)“[T]here is a power somewhere so organized, so subtle, so watchful, so interlocked, so pervasive that they better not speak above their breath when they speak in condemnation of it.”
Woodrow Wilson
(The New Freedom, Woodrow Wilson, 1921, p. 14)“In Politics, nothing happens by accident. If it happens, you can bet it was planned that way.”
Franklin D. Roosevelt
(Shadow Forces, Robert E. Herndon Sr, 2007, p. 123)

“I believe there are more instances of the abridgement of the freedom of the people by gradual and silent encroachments of those in power than by violent and sudden usurpations…. This danger ought to be wisely guarded against.”
James Madison
(The Debates, Resolutions, and Other Proceedings, in Convention, on The Adoption of The Federal Constitution, Vol. II, 1828, p. 90)

“In short, the ‘house of world order’ will have to be built from the bottom up rather than from the top down. It will look like a great ‘booming, buzzing confusion’…but an end run around national sovereignty, eroding it piece by piece, will accomplish much more than the old fashioned frontal assault.”
Richard Gardner (member of the Trilateral Commission, 1974)
(You Are Still Being Lied To, Russ Kick, 2009, p. 152)

“What will have to take place is a gradual adaptation of the social, economic and political system of the United States to the imperatives of World Order.”
— Harvard professor Stanley Hoffman
(Primacy or World Order, Stanley Hoffman, 1978, p. 311)

“They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety.”
Benjamin Franklin
(Memoirs of Benjamin Franklin, Volume 1, 1859, p. 127)

“The real rulers in Washington are invisible and exercise power from behind the scenes.”
— U.S. Supreme Court Justice Felix Frankfurter (1939-1962)
(The Fraud of The Fraud: Have You Been Taken For A Ride?, Jose M. Paulino, 2008, p. 40)

PROOFS OF A CONSPIRACY: FREE MASONS, ILLUMINATI, 1798

PROOFS OF THE DANGEROUS OF ILLUMINISM, 1802

ILLUSTRATIONS OF MASONRY, 1827

THE ANTI-MASONIC REVIEW, By A RENOUNCING MASON, 1828

OPINIONS ON FREEMASONRY, 1830

PROCEEDINGS OF THE U.S. ANTI-MASONIC CONVENTION, 1830

A REPLY OF THE GENESEE CONSOCIATION, MASONRY, 1830

DEBATES IN THE ANTI-MASONIC STATE CONVENTION, 1830

ANTICHRIST DETECTED, 1841

LETTERS ON THE MASONIC INSTITUTION, John Quincy Adams, 1847

THE CHARACTER, CLAIMS, etc. . . OF FREEMASONRY, 1869

THE BROKEN SEAL, THE MORGAN ABDUCTION AND MURDER, 1873

LETTERS AND ADDRESSES ON FREEMASONRY, John Quincy Adams, 1875

THE POWER OF THE SECRET EMPIRE, 1883

MASONRY AND BAAL-WORSHIP IDENTICAL, 1887

SECRET SOCIETIES, 1888

AMERICAN HAND-BOOK & CITIZEN’S MANUAL, FREEMASONRY, 1891

THE DEADLY DECEPTION, 1988

NEW WORLD ORDER SHILLS: LIARS AND DECEIVERS

THE REAL BOHEMIAN GROVE

1981 NEWS REPORT ABOUT BOHEMIAN GROVE

THE BILDERBERGS AND OTHER SECRET SOCIETIES

MASONRY: BEHIND CLOSED DOORS

A CHRISTIAN LOOKS AT SKULL AND BONES INITIATION

EXPLAINING THE ILLUMINATI, by John Todd a former Illuminatist Pt. 1

EXPLAINING THE ILLUMINATI, by John Todd a former Illuminatist Pt. 2

IDEOLOGICAL INDOCTRINATION: Ex-KGB Uri Bezmenov Pt. 1

IDEOLOGICAL INDOCTRINATION: Ex-KGB Uri Bezmenov Pt. 2

BILL CREATES DETENTION CAMPS IN U.S. FOR ‘EMERGENCES’!

CONCENTRATION CAMPS FOR U.S. CITIZENS

COLLAPSE OF U.S. ECONOMY & CIVIL WAR!

MIND CONTROL: How a Creeping Commitment Traps YOU in a Cult

THE ISLAM & CATHOLIC CONNECTION

LAW OF THE SEA TREATY: World Government TOWARDS A ONE WORLD SYSTEM NATIONAL ID CARD REQUIRED FOR ALL U.S. CITIZENS! The Real ID Card is a National ID (Ron Paul 2005) Real ID is the National ID Card New Hampshire opposes National ID law THE MARK OF THE BEAST Barcodes and 666: The Mark of the Beast? PHOENIX RISING Phoenix Rising Wake Up! The Lord is Returning The Illuminati and the New World Order HISTORY OF THE NEW WORLD ORDER HEGELIAN DIALECTICS U.S. CONCENTRATION CAMPS? – VIDEO U.S. DEATH Camps 1 U.S. DEATH Camps 2 THE RELIGIOUS VIEWS OF ADOLF HITLER THE NAZI CONNECTION THE FEDERAL RESERVE SCAM Freemasonry & the 20th Century Occult Revival LUCIFER: ANGEL OF LIGHT – FATHER OF LIES THE TEN COMMANDMENTS OF SATAN Loss of Sovereignty AMERICA: REPENT or PERISH! ECUMENISM – A NEW AGE OF DARKNESS
Resistance may cost you your life!And he had power to give life unto the image of the beast, that the image of the beast should both speak, and cause that as many as would not worship the image of the beast should be killed. (Revelation 13:15) Submission will cost you your soul!And the smoke of their torment ascendeth up for ever and ever: and they have no rest day nor night, who worship the beast and his image, and whosoever receiveth the mark of his name. (Revelation 14:11)

See A WOMAN RIDES THE BEAST, and THE TESTIMONY OF THE REFORMERS

If you have heard of the Illuminati Order and you thought it was some kind of mythological conspiracy theory, here are the archives from George Washington himself, which prove not only their existence, but that they were intensively active in the United States of America. George Washington was also certain that some of the illuminati had infiltrated some of the American Lodges of Freemasonry.

                                        “TO G. W. SNYDER.
                                                                                Mount Vernon, 24 October, 1798.
    REVEREND SIR,
I have your favor of the 17th instant before me, and my only motive for troubling you with the receipt of this letter is, to explain and correct a mistake, which I perceive the hurry in which I am obliged often to write letters has led you into.
It was not my intention to doubt, that the doctrines of the Illuminati and the principles of Jacobinism had not spread in the United States, On the contrary, no one is more fully satisfied of this fact than I am.
The idea that I meant to convey was, that I did not believe that the lodges of freemasons in this country had, as societies, endeavoured to propagate the diabolical tenets of the former, or pernicious principles of the latter, if they are susceptible of separation. That individuals of them may have done it, or that the founder, or instrument employed to found the Democratic Societies in the United States, may have had these objects, and actually had a separation of the people from their government in view, is too evident to be questioned.” (The Writings Of George Washington, Vol. XI., 1855, p. 337)

It is an undeniable fact that conspiracies exist. It is also an under appreciated fact that most people have been conditioned to pay little or no attention to conspiracies. Misinformation is often circulated in the media and elsewhere for the purpose of leading people away from the truth. This was in the past and still is today one of the main functions of the Catholic Jesuit organization. It is no coincident that high level Jesuits are also high ranking Freemasons. The following information reveals some of the methods employed to deceive. “Morals and Dogma” is an official Masonic book written by occultist Albert Pike. Pages 104 and 105 of this Satanic occult book states:

Masonry, like all the religions, all Mysteries, Hermetiscism, and Alchemy, conceals its secrets from all except the Adepts and Sages, or the Elect, and uses false explanations and misinterpretations of its symbols to mislead those who deserve to be mislead;”
“So Masonry jealously conceals its secrets, and intentionally leads conceited interpreters astray.” (Morals and Dogma, pp. 104, 105)

Only the “illuminated ones” at the highest levels of Freemasonry and other secretive societies are privy to the Luciferian agenda of the New World Order. (See Theosophy: The Worship of Lucifer and also George Washington’s Prayers)

No one is immune to deception. If we think we are immune to deception, it is then that we are in fact being deceived. “Let no man deceive himself. If any man among you seemeth to be wise in this world, let him become a fool, that he may be wise. For the wisdom of this world is foolishness with God. For it is written, He taketh the wise in their own craftiness.” (I Cor. 3:18,19). The Bible said, “And if any man think that he knoweth any thing, he knoweth nothing yet as he ought to know.” (I Cor. 8:2): “For if a man think himself to be something, when he is nothing, he deceiveth himself.” (Gal. 6:3). The prophet Obadiah said, “The pride of thine heart hath deceived thee” (Obad. 1:3). And Proverbs chapter 28 verse 26 says, “He that trusteth in his own heart is a fool”.

Jesus Christ warned us that many would come in his name and would deceive many: “Take heed that no man deceive you. For many shall come in my name, saying, I am Christ [Greek christos meaning Anointed]; and shall deceive many.” (Matt. 24:4,5). The Bible said, “Let no man deceive you with vain words:” (Eph. 5:6) and “Let no man deceive himself.” (I Cor. 3:18). The apostle Paul said, “Let no man deceive you by any means: for that day shall not come, except there come a falling away first,” a falling away from the “sound doctrine” of the “pure” “preserve[d] “holy scriptures”, “the faith which was once delivered unto the saints” (II Thess. 2:3; II Tim. 3:15; 4:2-4; Psa. 12:6,7; Prov. 30:5,6; Jude 1:3). Paul said, “Wherefore let him that thinketh he standeth take heed lest he fall.” (I Cor. 10:12).

Sometimes deception is acute and can suddenly sweep people away like a flood (Psa. 90:3-6; Rev. 12:15). But more often than not deception is a gradual process which takes place over a period of days, weeks, months or even years. Man usually forms his opinions based on his own life experiences and on the information that is readily accessible to him. Unfortunately, most of the sources we rely on for truthful, complete and unbiased information are sources controlled by “the prince of the power of the air, the spirit that now worketh in the children of disobedience” (Eph. 2:2). Bernard Goldberg, a former CBS news correspondent of twenty-eight years, exposed some of the media bias in the news industry. In his 2002 book, Bias, Goldberg said that “It’s important to know, too, that there isn’t a well-orchestrated, vast left-wing conspiracy in America’s newsrooms. The bitter truth, as we’ll see, is arguably worse.” (Bias, A CBS Insider Exposes How the Media Distort the News, 2002, p. 4). It is not a conservative right-wing press verses a liberal left-wing press. It is not an issue of one race of people verses another race of people. It is not a Democrat verses Republican issue. It is a truth verses falsehood issue.

Manipulation of ‘left’ and ‘right’ in domestic USA, where Wall Street supports both Republicans and Democrats, as their Australian associates support Liberal and Labor, is duplicated in the international field where ‘left’ and ‘right’ political structures are artificially constructed and collapsed in the drive for a one-world synthesis. In fact, ‘left’ and ‘right’ are two controlled factions of the Illuminati and other secretive societies. True history tells a story contrary to what we’ve been taught to regard as truth. Global elitists like The Order in the USA, The Group in the UK, the Illuminati in Germany, and the Politburo in Russia, control most of the media, the politics, the entertainment industries, and the education systems of the West. Thanks to corrupt and inept modern-day scholars, most of what is presented as history is in fact propaganda designed to control the masses. Our Western history is as distorted, censored, and largely useless as that of Hitler’s Germany, the Soviet Union or Communist China.

Some of the people involved in the release of information regarding the New World Order and New Age Religion conspiracies are actually the conspirators themselves. These subtly wicked people will allow only a certain amount of factual information to be released along with a fair amount of misinformation in order to make anyone willing to take such conspiracies seriously look foolish or just plain paranoid. They have successfully conditioned the public at large to view conspiracy researchers as simple-minded crackpots. A President of the United States of America had this to say about secretive organizations: “The very word ‘secrecy’ is repugnant in a free and open society; and we are as a people inherently and historically opposed to secret societies, to secret oaths and to secret proceedings. We decided long ago that the dangers of excessive and unwarranted concealment of pertinent facts far outweighed the dangers which are cited to justify it.” (John F. Kennedy, 27 April 1961). The Holy Bible speaks about numerous conspiracies. There are dozens of references to conspiracies and conspirators in the scriptures. There are many warnings in the Bible about the many deceivers and the strong delusion that will take place in the latter days prior to the return of the Lord Jesus Christ in the clouds of heaven with power and great glory and the end of the world. We would be wise to take heed to God’s warnings! (See 1981 NEWS REPORT ABOUT BOHEMIAN GROVETHE REAL BOHEMIAN GROVE20th CENTURY ATROCITIES OF THE ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH, and HISTORICAL BOOKS & DOCUMENTATION OF FACTS below!)

In his informative book, A History of the Holy Catholic Inquisition, Cyrus Mason wrote in 1835, “They [Jesuits] regard our country [the U.S.A.] as an open field, where they may pursue their schemes without molestation, and with entire success; where they may profit by the toleration enjoyed under our mild and free institutions.”
“These sworn servants of a foreign potentate [the pope] have as a leader an avowed defender of the inquisition. These emissaries are true to their patrons and their mother church. They defend her infallibility, and of course, must maintain her supremacy, and promote (in a prudent way) all her doctrines and institutions. They believe that her intolerance of all modes of faith but her own, is for the glory of God and the good of the whole world; and, holding her infallibility, they must, of course, defend the machinery by which she has, in former ages, carried out her spirit of intolerance against those who have dared to think and speak for themselves in the interpretation of the Scriptures.”
“… her infallibility is the key-stone of the arch on which she rests. The practical effects of the Catholic religion, in the hands of these [Jesuit] agents of the pope, will be the same in our country as they are in the old world, only they must be more slowly disclosed, and defended with caution…. There is nothing like a gradual initiation to a new order of things.”(A History of the Holy Catholic Inquisition, Cyrus Mason, 1843, pp. 5,6,7) (See also THE TESTIMONY OF THE REFORMERS, and A WOMAN RIDES THE BEAST)

The September 2000 United Nations Millennium Declaration states some of the goals that the New World Order elitists hope to accomplish in the next few years. Section II, subsection 9, paragraph 4, states: “We resolve therefore: To ensure the implementation, by States Parties, of treaties in areas such as arms control and disarmament and of international humanitarian law and human rights law, and call upon all States to consider signing and ratifying the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court.” Why the “Rome Statute?” Because, as we shall see, “all roads lead back to Rome”. This is why our Presidents of late were not allowed, even if they wanted, to dissolve the United States of America’s unholy union with the corrupt United Nations organization. Paragraph 10 states, “To take concerted action to end illicit traffic in small arms and light weapons, especially by making arms transfers more transparent and supporting regional disarmament measures,…” (See United Nations Millennium Declaration). It is said that if you place a living frog in a pan of water and gradually heat the water, the frog will not perceive the temperature change and will remain in the pan, thus allowing himself to be scalded to death. Like the frog in a pan of hot water who’s flesh has slowly become desensitized to his surroundings, Americans are being led astray and lulled into a state of complacency with the charms of “THE MOTHER OF HARLOTS”, while our country is being methodically taken over by the secret and not so secret wicked rulers in high places (Eph. 6:12; 2 Tim. 4:1-4; Rev. 2:19-22; 17:1-6; 18:1-5). The disarmament of private law-abiding citizens in Australia, Canada and the U.K. has begun in ernest. U.S. citizens are next in line to be disarmed and controlled by our new land-lords — Satan’s “ministers of righteousness”(II Cor. 11:14,15)

HISTORICAL BOOKS & DOCUMENTATION OF FACTS

DEFENSE OF THE TRUE HOLY SCRIPTURES, 1583
POPISH IDOLATRY, 1765
A MASTER-KEY TO POPERY, 1773
PROOFS OF A CONSPIRACY: FREE MASONS, ILLUMINATI, 1798
PROOFS of THE DANGEROUS of ILLUMINISM, 1802
HISTORY OF THE JESUITS, Vol. 1, 1816
HISTORY OF THE JESUITS, Vol. 2, 1816
APOSTASY OF THE CHURCH OF ROME, 1818
ROMANISM VERSES THE BIBLE, 1827
A SKETCH OF THE ROMISH CONTROVERSY, 1831
LETTERS IN THE ROMAN CATHOLIC CONTROVERSY, 1834
POPISH FRAUDS DETECTED & DISCLOSED, 1835
POPERY: AN ENEMY TO CIVIL & RELIGIOUS LIBERTY, 1836
THE DOCTRINE of AURICULAR CONFESSION, 1841
ANTICHRIST DETECTED, 1841
MORMONISM IN ALL AGES, 1842
THE HISTORY OF THE SAINTS… JOE SMITH & MORMONISM, 1842
A HISTORY OF THE HOLY CATHOLIC INQUISITION, 1843
PERSECUTIONS OF POPERY, 1844
POPERY, THE ENEMY OF SCRIPTURE, 1844
THE JESUITS, AS THEY WERE AND ARE, 1845
POPERY AND THE UNITED STATES, 1847
AURICULAR CONFESSION, A SERMON, 1848
THE HISTORY OF AURICULAR CONFESSION, Vol. 1, 1848
THE HISTORY OF AURICULAR CONFESSION, Vol. 2, 1848
ROMISH SACRAMENTS AND THE CONFESSIONAL, 1850
DARK DEEDS OF THE PAPACY, 1851
JOSEPH SMITH, THE GREAT AMERICAN IMPOSTER, 1852
FOREIGN CONSPIRACY AGAINST THE LIBERTIES OF THE U.S., 1852
ROMANISM AT HOME, 1852
THE EVIL OF INFANT BAPTISM By A. Campbell, 1852
TWELVE LETTERS ON TRANSUBSTANTIATION, 1853
ROMANISM, THE ENEMY OF EDUCATION, 1853
WHAT POPERY IS WHEN ARMED WITH POWER, 1853
THE POSITION OF CHRISTIANITY IN THE UNITED STATES, 1854
THE EVILS OF INFANT BAPTISM by R.B.C. Howell, 1854
HISTORY OF THE JESUITS, 1854
RIGHT OF THE BIBLE IN OUR PUBLIC SCHOOLS, 1854
MORMONISM TRIED BY ITS OWN STANDARDS, 1855
THE CRISIS; or, THE ENEMIES of AMERICA UNMASKED, 1855
PAGANISM, POPERY, AND CHRISTIANITY, 1855
MODERN JESUITISM, 1855
SECRET INSTRUCTIONS OF THE JESUITS, 1857
THE ROMAN CATHOLIC ELEMENTS IN AMERICAN HISTORY, 1857
THE AMERICAN AND FOREIGN CHRISTIAN UNION, Volume 9, 1858
POPE, or PRESIDENT? FACTS FOR AMERICANS, 1859
THE TWO BABYLONS; THE PAPAL WORSHIP, 1862
THE EVILS OF INFANT BAPTISM by A.N. Arnold, 1867
CHEMICAL CHANGE IN THE EUCHARIST, 1867
THE MYSTERIES AND CRIMES OF MORMONISM, 1870
MORMONISM: ITS RISE, PROGRESS, AND PRESENT CONDITION, 1870
THE BIBLE IN SCHOOLS, 1870
QUESTION OF THE HOUR: THE BIBLE & THE SCHOOL FUND, 1870
THE FOLLIES AND CRIMES OF BIGAMY YOUNG, 1874
TELL IT ALL: THE STORY OF A LIFE EXPERIENCE IN MORMONISM, 1875
DEEDS OF DARKNESS…AURICULAR CONFESSION, 1875
THE PAPACY AND THE CIVIL POWER, 1876
MORMONISM UNVEILED; CONFESSIONS OF THE LATE MORMON BISHOP, 1877
VATICANISM UNMASKED: or ROMANISM IN THE UNITED STATES, 1877
ROMANISM AS IT IS, 1878
THE POWER OF THE SECRET EMPIRE, 1883
THE HISTORY AND CLAIMS OF THE CONFESSIONAL, 1884
THE MORMON HELL ON EARTH, 1884
BOOK OF MORMON: IS IT FROM GOD? 1885
THE JESUITS; A COMPLETE HISTORY, 1885
JOSEPH SMITH THE PROPHET, HIS FAMILY & FRIENDS, 1886
THE GOLDEN BIBLE: or, THE BOOK OF MORMON. IS IT FROM GOD? 1887
MASONRY AND BAAL-WORSHIP IDENTICAL, 1887
WASHINGTON IN THE LAP OF ROME, 1888
ROMANISM VS. THE PUBLIC SCHOOL SYSTEM, 1888
ROMANISM AND THE REPUBLIC, 1890
INFLUENCE OF THE ROMAN CATHOLIC CONFESSIONAL, 1888
THE CONFESSIONAL, 1889
GREAT CONSPIRACY AGAINST OUR PUBLIC SCHOOLS, 1890
OUR COUNTRY: ITS POSSIBLE FUTURE AND ITS PRESENT CRISIS, 1891
A HISTORY OF THE GREAT CONSPIRACY, 1892
AMERICA’S NEXT WAR, 1892
AMERICA OR ROME, WHICH? 1895
THE TRADITIONAL TEXT OF THE HOLY BIBLE, 1896
CHRISTIAN SCIENCE AND ITS PROBLEMS, 1898
CHRISTIAN SCIENCE EXAMINED, 1898
CHRISTIAN SCIENCE, 1899
CHRISTIAN SCIENCE AND OTHER SUPERSTITIONS, 1899
CHRISTIAN SCIENCE AND KINDRED DELUSIONS, 1899
EDDYISM: CHRISTIAN SCIENCE NEITHER CHRISTIAN NOR SCIENTIFIC, 1899
CHRISTIAN SCIENCE AGAINST ITSELF, 1902
MORMONISM EXPOSED, 1902
THE MORMON WATERLOO, 1902
THE MORMON MENACE, 1905
LINCOLN’S USE OF THE BIBLE, 1909
CHRISTIAN SCIENCE IN THE LIGHT OF HOLY SCRIPTURE, 1909
CUMORAH REVISITED, 1910
THE PRIMITIVE CHURCH & THE PRIMACY OF ROME, 1910
CHRISTIAN SCIENCE FALSELY SO CALLED, 1911
FOURTEEN YEARS A JESUIT, Vol. 1, 1911
FOURTEEN YEARS A JESUIT, Vol. 2, 1911
ROMANISM: A MENACE TO THE NATION, 1912
ROMANISM IN THE LIGHT OF HISTORY, 1914
THE JESUITS IN HISTORY, 1914
THE TRUE ORIGIN OF THE BOOK OF MORMON, 1914
CONSTITUTION OR POPE? 1915
THE ROMAN CATHOLIC HIERARCHY: THE DEADLIEST MENACE, 1915
WHY I REJECT THE “HELPING HAND” OF MILLENNIAL DAWN, 1915
AMERICAN ANTHROPOLOGY DISPROVES THE BOOK OF MORMON, 1916
INFANT BAPTISM HISTORICALLY CONSIDERED, 1916
PAPAL SOVEREIGNTY, 1917
IN THE CULT KINGDOM: MORMONISM, EDDYISM, RUSSELLISM, 1918
THE MORMON SAINTS, 1919
WHY NOT “RUSSELLISM”?: ALIAS MILLENNIAL DAWN”, 1920
THE TRUTH ABOUT CHRISTIAN SCIENCE; THE FOUNDER & THE FAITH, 1920
WHAT IS CHRISTIAN SCIENCE? 1922
THE SUPPRESSED TRUTH, 1922
ROME’s LAW, OR OURS – WHICH? 1928
ROMAN CATHOLICS IN AMERICA FALSIFYING HISTORY, 1928
THE VATICAN IN WORLD POLITICS, 1949
THE DEADLY DECEPTION, 1988

CLICK HERE FOR MORE HISTORICAL BOOKS & DOCUMENTATION OF FACTS


IMPORTANT QUOTES ON LIBERTY & THE 2nd AMENDMENT RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS

The Bill of Rights of The United States of America, Amendment II states:

“A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” The first ten amendments to the Constitution, adopted 4 March 1789, ratified 15 December 1791.

Who are the militia? Are they not ourselves? Is it feared, then, that we shall turn our arms each man against his own bosom. Congress have no power to disarm the militia. Their swords, and every other terrible implement of the soldier, are the birthright of an American…[T]he unlimited power of the sword is not in the hands of either the federal or state governments, but, where I trust in God it will ever remain, in the hands of the people. [emphasis added]
— Tench Coxe, The Pennsylvania Gazette, Feb. 20, 1788.

The constitutions of most of our States assert, that all power is inherent in the people; that they may exercise it by themselves, in all cases to which they think themselves competent (as in electing their functionaries, executive and legislative, and deciding by a jury of themselves, in all judiciary cases in which any fact is involved), or they may act by representatives, freely and equally chosen; that it is their right and duty to be at all times armed;
— Thomas Jefferson to John Cartwright, 1824. Memoir, Correspondence, And Miscellanies: From The Papers of Thomas Jefferson, Vol. IV, 1830, p. 395

Militias, when properly formed, are in fact the people themselves and include all men capable of bearing arms….[W]hereas, to preserve liberty, it is essential that the whole body of the people always possess arms, and be taught alike, especially when young, how to use them;…
— Richard Henry Lee, The Pennsylvania Gazette, Feb. 20, 1788.

No freeman shall be debarred the use of arms.
— Thomas Jefferson: Draft Virginia Constitution, 1776. The Jeffersonian Cyclopedia, 1900, p. 51

And that the said Constitution be never construed to authorize Congress to infringe the just liberty of the press or the rights of conscience; or to prevent the people of the United States who are peaceable citizens from keeping their own arms….
— Samuel Adams, in “Phila. Independent Gazetteer”, August 20, 1789; The Life and Public Services of Samuel Adams, Vol. III, 1865, p. 267

The right of self-defense is the first law of nature: in most governments it has been the study of rulers to confine this right within the narrowest limits possible. Wherever standing armies are kept up, and when the right of the people to keep and bear arms is, under any color or pretext whatsoever, prohibited, liberty, if not already annihilated, is on the brink of destruction.
— St. George Tucker (in Blackstone’s Commentaries, St. George Tucker, 1803, p. 300)

Are we at last brought to such an humiliating and debasing degradation, that we cannot be trusted with arms for our own defense? Where is the difference between having our arms in our own possession and under our own direction, and having them under the management of Congress? If our defense be the real object of having those arms, in whose hands can they be trusted with more propriety, or equal safety to us, as in our own hands?
— Patrick Henry Patrick Henry; Life, Correspondence and Speeches, Vol. III, 1891, p. 494

[The Constitution preserves] the advantage of being armed, which the Americans possess over the people of almost every other nation….[where] the governments are afraid to trust the people with arms.
— James Madison, in Federalist 46, The Federalist, on The New Constitution, Vol. I, 1802, p. 316.

Before a standing army can rule, the people must be disarmed; as they are in almost every kingdom in Europe. The supreme power in America cannot enforce unjust laws by the sword; because the whole body of the people are armed, and constitute a force superior to any band of regular troops that can be, on any pretence, raised in the United States. A military force, at the command of Congress, can execute no laws, but such as the people perceive to be just and constitutional; for they will possess the power, and jealousy will instantly inspire the inclination, to resist the execution of a law which appears to them unjust and oppressive.
— Noah Webster, (Philadelphia 1787) Pamphlets on the Constitution of the United States, 1888, p. 56

A strong body makes the mind strong. As to the species of exercises, I advise the gun. While this gives moderate exercise to the body, it gives boldness, enterprise and independence to the mind. Games played with the ball, and others of that nature, are too violent for the body and stamp no character on the mind. Let your gun therefore be your constant companion of your walks.
— Thomas Jefferson to Peter Carr, 1785. Memoir, Correspondence, And Miscellanies: From The Papers of Thomas Jefferson, Vol. I, 1830, p. 287

[O]ne loves to possess arms, though they hope never to have occasion for them.
— Thomas Jefferson to George Washington, 1796. Memoir, Correspondence, And Miscellanies: From The Papers of Thomas Jefferson, Vol. III, 1830, p. 331

Guard with jealous attention the public liberty. Suspect every one who approaches that jewel. Unfortunately, nothing will preserve it but downright force. Whenever you give up that force, you are inevitably ruined.
— Patrick Henry Life of Patrick Henry, William Wirt, 1817, p. 273

They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety.
— Benjamin Franklin, Memoirs of the Life and Writings of Benjamin Franklin, London, 1818

[W]hen the resolution of enslaving America was formed in Great Britain, the British Parliament was advised by an artful man, who was governor of Pennsylvania, to disarm the people; that it was the best and most effectual way to enslave them; but that they should not do it openly, but weaken them, and let them sink gradually….
— George Mason, speech of June 14, 1788, The Debates in the Several State Conventions on the Adoption of the Federal Constitution, Vol. III, p. 380

Why should we not provide against the danger of having our militia, our real and natural strength, destroyed? The general government ought, at the same time, to have some such power. But we need not give them power to abolish our militia…. They may effect the destruction of the militia, by rendering the service odious to the people themselves, by harassing them from one end of the continent to the other, and by keeping them under martial law.
— George Mason, speech of June 14, 1788, The Debates in the Several State Conventions on the Adoption of the Federal Constitution, Vol. III, p. 380

One of the ordinary modes, by which tyrants accomplish their purposes without resistance, is by disarming the people, and making it an offense to keep arms, and by substituting a regular army in the stead of a resort to the Militia. The friends of a free Government cannot be too watchful, to overcome the dangerous tendency of the public mind to sacrifice to mere private convenience this powerful check upon the designs of ambitious men.
— Constitutional scholar and Supreme Court Justice Joseph Story (The Constitutional Class Book by Joseph Story LL. D., 1834, p. 149)

Adolf Hitler understood this concept well and used it to control and slaughter millions of people. After having occupied Russian territory Hitler said: The most foolish mistake we could possibly make would be to permit the conquered Eastern peoples to have arms. History teaches that all conquerors who have allowed their subject races to carry arms have prepared their own downfall by doing so.
— Adolf Hitler, April 11, 1942, quoted in Hitlers Tischegesprache Im Fuhrerhauptquartier 1941-1942. [Hitler’s Table-Talk at the Fuhrer’s Headquarters 1941-1942], Dr. Henry Picker, ed. (Athenaum-Verlag, Bonn, 1951) (Hitler’s Secret Conversations 403 (Norman Cameron and R.H. Stevens trans., 1961)

Even the father of non-violent resistance, Mahatma Gandhi, understood the dangers of a ban on possessing arms and spoke out against gun-control: Among the many misdeeds of the British rule in India, history will look upon the act of depriving a whole nation of arms, as the blackest.
— Mahatma Gandhi, GANDHI: An autobiography. The story of my experiments with Truth, p. 446

No clause in the Constitution could by any rule of construction be conceived to give to Congress a power to disarm the people. Such a flagitious attempt could only be made under some general pretense by a state legislature. But if in any blind pursuit of inordinate power, either should attempt it, this amendment may be appealed to as a restraint on both.
— William Rawle, A View of the Constitution of the United States of America, 2nd Ed., 1829, pp. 125, 126

As civil rulers, not having their duty to the people before them, may attempt to tyrannize, and as the military forces which must be occasionally raised to defend our country, might pervert their power to the injury of their fellow citizens, the people are confirmed by the article in their right to keep and bear their private arms.
— Tench Coxe in ‘Remarks on the First Part of the Amendments to the Federal Constitution’ under the Pseudonym ‘A Pennsylvanian’ in the Philadelphia Federal Gazette, June 18, 1789 at 2 col. 1)

Little more can reasonably be aimed at, with respect to the people at large, than to have them properly armed and equipped;…
[I]f circumstances should at any time oblige the government to form an army of any magnitude, that army can never be formidable to the liberties of the people, while there is a large body of citizens, little, if at all, inferior to them in discipline and the use of arms, who stand ready to defend their own rights….
— Alexander Hamilton speaking of standing armies in Federalist 29, The Federalist, on The New Constitution, Vol. I, 1802, pp. 185,186

The right of the citizens to keep and bear arms has justly been considered as the palladium of the liberties of a republic; since it offers a strong moral check against usurpation and arbitrary power of rulers; and will generally, even if these are successful in the first instance, enable the people to resist and triumph over them.
— Supreme Court Justice Joseph Story of the John Marshall Court, (A Familiar Exposition of The Constitution of The United States by Joseph Story LL. D., 1840, p. 265)

And what country can preserve its liberties, if its rulers are not warned from time to time, that this people preserve the spirit of resistance? Let them take arms….The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants.
— Thomas Jefferson in a letter to William S. Smith, 1787. Memoir, Correspondence, And Miscellanies: From The Papers of Thomas Jefferson, Vol. II, 1830, p. 268

If ever the Time should come, when vain & aspiring Men shall possess the highest Seats in Government, our Country will stand in Need of its experienced Patriots to prevent its Ruin.
— Samuel Adams, Letter to James Warren, 12 February 1779, The Writings of Samuel Adams – Volume 4

If we love wealth better than liberty, the tranquillity of servitude, than the animating contest of freedom—go from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains set lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen.
— Samuel Adams, Speech at the State House of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, 1 August 1776, Orations of American Orators, 1900

Roger Sherman, during House consideration of a militia bill (1790), [C]onceived it to be the privilege of every citizen, and one of his most essential rights, to bear arms, and to resist every attack upon his liberty or property, by whomsoever made. The particular states, like private citizens, have a right to be armed, and to defend, by force of arms, their rights, when invaded.
14 Debates in the House of Representatives, ed. Linda Grand De Pauw. (Balt., Johns Hopkins Univ. Press, 1972), 92-3.

Certainly one of the chief guarantees of freedom under any government, no matter how popular and respected, is the right of the citizens to keep and bear arms. […] the right of the citizens to bear arms is just one guarantee against arbitrary government and one more safeguard against a tyranny which now appears remote in America, but which historically has proved to be always possible.
— Hubert H. Humphrey, 1960

According to the National Crime Survey administered by the Bureau of the Census and the National Institute of Justice, it was found that only 12 percent of those who use a gun to resist assault are injured, as are 17 percent of those who use a gun to resist robbery. These percentages are 27 and 25 percent, respectively, if they passively comply with the felon’s demands. Three times as many were injured if they used other means of resistance.
— G. Kleck, “Policy Lessons from Recent Gun Control Research,” Law and Contemporary Problems 49, no. 1. (Winter 1986.): 35-62.

If gun laws in fact worked, the sponsors of this type of legislation should have no difficulty drawing upon long lists of examples of criminal acts reduced by such legislation. That they cannot do so after a century and a half of trying — that they must sweep under the rug the southern attempts at gun control in the 1870-1910 period, the northeastern attempts in the 1920-1939 period, the attempts at both Federal and State levels in 1965-1976 — establishes the repeated, complete and inevitable failure of gun laws to control serious crime.
— Senator Orrin Hatch, in a 1982 Senate Report

The conclusion is thus inescapable that the history, concept, and wording of the second amendment to the Constitution of the United States, as well as its interpretation by every major commentator and court in the first half-century after its ratification, indicates that what is protected is an individual right of a private citizen to own and carry firearms in a peaceful manner.
Report of the Subcommittee On The Constitution of the Committee On The Judiciary, United States Senate, 97th Congress, second session (February, 1982), SuDoc# Y4.J 89/2: Ar 5/5

In recent years it has been suggested that the Second Amendment protects the “collective” right of states to maintain militias, while it does not protect the right of “the people” to keep and bear arms. If anyone entertained this notion in the period during which the Constitution and the Bill of Rights were debated and ratified, it remains one of the most closely guarded secrets of the eighteenth century, for no known writing surviving from the period between 1787 and 1791 states such a thesis.
— Stephen P. Halbrook, “That Every Man Be Armed”, 1984

The Constitution is not an instrument for the government to restrain the people, it is an instrument for the people to restrain the government – lest it come to dominate our lives and interests.
— Patrick Henry, Pocket Patriot, 2005, p. 52

I believe there are more instances of the abridgement of the freedom of the people by gradual and silent encroachments of those in power, than by violent and sudden usurpations;
— James Madison (Speech in the Virginia Ratifying Convention on Control of the Military, June 16, 1788 in: History of the Virginia Federal Convention of 1788, vol. 1, p. 130 (H.B. Grigsby ed. 1890) The Debates in The Several State Conventions on The Adoption of The Federal Constitution, Vol. III, 1888, p. 87

Congress….may carry on the most wicked and pernicious of schemes under the dark veil of secrecy. The liberties of a people never were nor ever will be secure, when the transactions of their rulers may be concealed from them.
— Patrick Henry Life, Correspondence and Speeches, Vol. 3, 1891, p. 496

An appeal to arms and the God of Hosts is all that is left us! It is vain, sir, to extenuate the matter. Gentlemen may cry peace, peace; but there is no peace. The war is actually begun. The next gale that comess from the north, will bring to our ears the clash of resounding arms! Our brethren are already in the field. Why stand we here idle? What is it that gentlemen wish? What would they have? Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery? Forbid it, Almighty God! I know not what course others may take, but as for me, give me liberty or death!
— Patrick Henry (Speech delivered before the Virginia Convention of Delegates, March 23, 1775 A Biography of the Signers of the Declaration of Independence, 1839, p. 309)

 

Dr. Suzanna Hupp Testimony Before Congress on the 2nd Amendment

GUN CONTROL IN AMERICA

ENGLAND GUN BAN UPDATE

GUN CONTROL IN CANADA

COLLAPSE OF U.S. ECONOMY & CIVIL WAR?

20th CENTURY ATROCITIES OF THE RCC

The Worst Killers In History/ Croatian Nazis – Ustasha 1 of 2

The Worst Killers In History/ Croatian Nazis – Ustasha 2 of 2

THE GEORGIA GUIDE STONES

Note: These next two links could be legitimate Constitution-loving Americans, or they could be anti-Constitution propaganda used as a tool to incite violence and give the radical socialist anti-Christian government an excuse to attack its own law-abiding freedom loving citizens. Remember to pray for the best and prepare for the worst. And, as always, use caution and beware of the unseen hands behind the curtain pulling the strings.

SOME IN U.S. MILITARY JOINING RESISTANCE TO DEFEND CONSTITUTION

OATH KEEPERS


The Constitution of The United States of America, Article VI, paragraph two, states:

This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding. [emphasis added]

The following was taken from:
HANDBOOK OF AMERICAN CONSTITUTIONAL LAW
by Henry Campbell Black (Constitutional Scholar and Author of Black’s Law Dictionary), 4th ed. 1927

(Page 103)
LIMITATIONS ON JUDICIAL POWER

The judicial department can neither make nor execute the laws, nor interfere with either of the departments in the constitutional discharge of its powers and duties, nor can judges be charged with the performance of non-judicial duties.

Courts Cannot Make or Amend Laws
The judicial department cannot legislate; its duty is to interpret and apply the statutes (if constitutional) exactly as they stand. Even in
(Page 104)
the performance of this duty the courts must not attempt to make law. A construction of a statute contrary to its obvious meaning is an encroachment on the legislature. Neither can the courts amend statutes, however worthy the object to be effected or however evil the consequences to be averted. Though a statute may be imperfect, lacking in detail, or impracticable, the courts have no power to remedy the defects. And a court must not write into a statute an exception which the legislature did not make, and on the other hand, a casus omissus [case omitted] does not justify judicial legislation. Nor can the courts inflict any penalties for acts which the legislature has not declared to be a crime.
(Page 105)
…, nor can they lawfully enjoin the passage of a statute or ordinance or undertake to prevent the enactment of unconstitutional laws. [emphasis added](Page 366)
THE POLICE POWER

The police power of a state is the inherent sovereign authority under which its legislature may, within constitutional limits, prescribe laws and regulations to safeguard the safety, health, and morals of the people, prevent fraud and oppression, and promote the public convenience, prosperity, and general welfare. [emphasis added]

(Page 370)
The police power is an attribute of government fundamentally necessary to the public safety, but so easily perverted as to be extremely dangerous to the rights and the liberty of the citizen. Even when properly defined and limited, it is so far-reaching in its importance and so paramount in its sway, even as against guarantied private rights, that its enlargement, by continual loose applications of the term to cases where it is neither needed nor appropriate, is a serious menace to personal freedom.

Are Federal, State and Local Officials Violating Their Sacred Oaths of Allegiance to the U.S. Constitution?

“[T]he Constitution controls any legislative act repugnant to it….a legislative act contrary to the Constitution is not law….an act of the Legislature repugnant to the Constitution is void.” (Marbury v. Madison, (Chief Justice Marshall, U.S. Supreme Court, 1803. 1 Cranch’s Reports, 137-180), pp. 32,33.)“It is also not entirely unworthy of observation that, in declaring what shall be the supreme law of the land, the Constitution itself is first mentioned, and not the laws of the United States generally…. Thus, the particular phraseology of the Constitution of the United States confirms and strengthens the principle, supposed to be essential to all written Constitutions, that a law repugnant to the Constitution is void, and that courts, as well as other departments, are bound by that instrument.” (Ibid, pp. 36,37.)

In a September 1859 speech at Cincinnati, Ohio, Abraham Lincoln said,

“The people of these United States are the rightful masters of both congresses and courts, not to overthrow the Constitution, but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution.” (Political Debates Between Abraham Lincoln and Stephen A. Douglas, 1894 p. 315)

If the Constitution says one thing and a legislature or judge says something else, a federal, state or local official who is sworn to support the Constitution must follow the Constitution. To do otherwise is to disregard the rule of law. Any act of legislation contrary to the U.S. Constitution, and any attempt to enforce such law, is strictly illegal. Our officials in all sectors of government are engaged in criminal conduct by enforcing unconstitutional laws!

 

THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA: A POLICE STATE!
Presidential Executive Orders to be Issued in the case of Martial Law

This is list of the Executive Orders associated with FEMA that would suspend the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. These Executive Orders have been on record for nearly 30 years and could be enacted by the stroke of a Presidential pen:

The Federal Register at The National Archives numeric codification of the Executive Orders

The Federal Register Presidential ProclamationsDefinition of Martial Law:
1. the law temporarily imposed upon an area by state or national military forces when civil authority has broken down or during wartime military operations.
2. the law imposed upon a defeated country or occupied territory by the military forces of the occupying power.

EXECUTIVE ORDER 10990
Allows the government to take over all modes of transportation and control of highways and seaports.

EXECUTIVE ORDER 10995
Allows the government to seize and control the communication media.

EXECUTIVE ORDER 10997
Allows the government to take over all electrical power, gas, petroleum, fuels and minerals.

EXECUTIVE ORDER 10998
Allows the government to seize all means of transportation, including personal cars, trucks or vehicles of any kind and total control over all highways, seaports, and waterways.

EXECUTIVE ORDER 10999
Allows the government to take over all food resources and farms.

EXECUTIVE ORDER 11000
Allows the government to mobilize civilians into work brigades under government supervision.

EXECUTIVE ORDER 11001
Allows the government to take over all health, education and welfare functions.

EXECUTIVE ORDER 11002
Designates the Postmaster General to operate a national registration of all persons.

EXECUTIVE ORDER 11003
Allows the government to take over all airports and aircraft, including commercial aircraft.

EXECUTIVE ORDER 11004
Allows the Housing and Finance Authority to relocate communities, build new housing with public funds, designate areas to be abandoned, and establish new locations for populations.

EXECUTIVE ORDER 11005
Allows the government to take over railroads, inland waterways and public storage facilities.

EXECUTIVE ORDER 11051
Specifies the responsibility of the Office of Emergency Planning and gives authorization to put all Executive Orders into effect in times of increased international tensions and economic or financial crisis.

EXECUTIVE ORDER 11310
Grants authority to the Department of Justice to enforce the plans set out in Executive Orders, to institute industrial support, to establish judicial and legislative liaison, to control all aliens, to operate penal and correctional institutions, and to advise and assist the President.

EXECUTIVE ORDER 11049
Assigns emergency preparedness function to federal departments and agencies, consolidating 21 operative Executive Orders issued over a fifteen year period.

EXECUTIVE ORDER 11921
Allows the Federal Emergency Preparedness Agency to develop plans to establish control over the mechanisms of production and distribution, of energy sources, wages, salaries, credit and the flow of money in U.S. financial institution in any undefined national emergency. It also provides that when a state of emergency is declared by the President, Congress cannot review the action for six months. The Federal Emergency Management Agency has broad powers in every aspect of the nation. General Frank Salzedo, chief of FEMA’s Civil Security Division stated in a 1983 conference that he saw FEMA’s role as a “new frontier in the protection of individual and governmental leaders from assassination, and of civil and military installations from sabotage and/or attack, as well as prevention of dissident groups from gaining access to U.S. opinion, or a global audience in times of crisis.” FEMA’s powers were consolidated by President Carter to incorporate the…

National Security Act of 1947
Allows for the strategic relocation of industries, services, government and other essential economic activities, and to rationalize the requirements for manpower, resources and production facilities.

1950 Defense Production Act
Gives the President sweeping powers over all aspects of the economy.

Act of August 29, 1916
Authorizes the Secretary of the Army, in time of war, to take possession of any transportation system for transporting troops, material, or any other purpose related to the emergency.

International Emergency Economic Powers Act
Enables the President to seize the property of a foreign country or national. These powers were transferred to FEMA in a sweeping consolidation in 1979.

WAKE UP AMERICA! YOUR LEADERS HAVE TRASHED YOUR CONSTITUTION!

“O my people, they which lead thee cause thee to err, and destroy the way of thy paths.” (Isaiah 3:12).

Under the pretext of peace and safety America’s leaders, at all levels of government, have violated their sacred oaths of office in failing to uphold and defend the United States Constitution, “the supreme Law of the Land” (U.S. Constitution, Article VI, paragraph II).The framers of our Constitution established a separation of powers to further protect the people from possible government abuse of power. In his Farewell Address in 1796, George Washington warned his nation against the usurpation of power by one department of government over another. Washington said, “It is important, likewise, that the habits of thinking, in a free country, should inspire caution in those intrusted with its administration, to confine themselves within their respective constitutional spheres, avoiding, in the exercise of the power of one department, to encroach upon another. The spirit of encroachment tends to consolidate the powers of all the departments in one, and thus to create, whatever the form of government, a real despotism. A just estimate of that love of power, and proneness to abuse it, which predominates in the human heart, is sufficient to satisfy us of the truth of this position. The necessity of reciprocal checks, in the exercise of political power, by dividing and distributing it into different depositories, and constituting each the guardian of public weal against invasions by the others, has been evinced by experiments ancient and modern; some of them in our country and under our own eyes.” (A Biography of the Signers of the Declaration of Independence, L. Carroll Judson, 1839, p. 319).

George Washington also warned the people of the United States against “the insidious wiles of foreign influence”. Washington said, “As avenues to foreign influence in innumerable ways, such attachments are particularly alarming to the truly enlightened and independent patriot. How many opportunities do they afford to tamper with domestic factions, to practice the arts of seduction, to mislead public opinion, to influence or awe the public councils? Such an attachment of a small or weak towards a great and powerful nation dooms the former to be the satellite of the latter.” Washington believed that America should have “as little political connection as possible” with foreign nations. Washington said, “The unity of government which constitutes you one people, is also now dear to you. It is justly so; for it is a main pillar in the edifice of your real independence;… But as it is easy to foresee, that from different causes and from different quarters, much pains will be taken, many artifices employed, to weaken in your minds the conviction of this truth; as this is the point in your political fortress against which the batteries of internal and external enemies will be most constantly and actively (though often covertly and insidiously) directed” (A Biography of the Signers of the Declaration of Independence, L. Carroll Judson, 1839, pp. 315, 321, 322).

From the highest to the lowest levels of government, America’s leaders have sold out their communities and their nation to the interests of foreign governments, world bankers and other foreign entities. Noah Webster defines treason as “the offense of attempting to overthrow the government of the state to which the offender owes allegiance, or of betraying the state into the hands of a foreign power…. In the United States, treason is confined to the actual levying of war against the United States, or in adhering to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort.” (American Dictionary of The English Language, 1828). Are the actions of our leaders not treasonous? Leaders who are willing to turn over U.S. sovereignty to foreign powers? Leaders who are willing to allow private U.S. citizens to be tried and convicted in the wicked tribunal of the “World Court”? Leaders who are passing unconstitutional “hate crime” legislation destroying our freedoms? Leaders who have “hijacked the role of our Grand Jury and the courtroom jury and, henceforth, embarked on a mission of misinformation, distortions, and blatant lies to convince the American people, and the entire legal community, that it is the government that determines what is right and what is wrong…” ? (“Runaway” Grand Juries vs. The Runaway State, Mark S. McGrew). Most of America’s elected, hired and appointed officials have sold out their country for personal gain. As Patrick Henry said, “Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery?” (see also Secret Agenda: Law of The Sea Treaty)

Will patriotic Americans sit idly while our elected and appointed officials destroy our Constitution? Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia wrote, “Day by day, case by case, the Supreme Court is busy designing a Constitution for a country I do not recognize.” Will we allow Congress to continue to pass unconstitutional laws, such as “hate crime” laws, and revert back to the dark ages when it was a criminal offense, punishable by excommunication or death, to even utter a word that was not in conformity with the ruling political/religious hierarchy? Patrick Henry said, “I know of no way of judging the future but by the past.” (A Biography of the Signers of the Declaration of Independence, 1839, p. 308). When Nero, Marcus Aurelius, Diocletion, the Saxons, the Danes, the Normans, Kings Henry the IV, V, and VIII, and Queen (Bloody) Mary, who were among the many Roman emperors, English monarchs and others that destroyed scriptures made from the time of the apostles, the charge against Christians and their scriptures was odio humani generis, Latin for ‘hate crimes’ (lit. hatred of the human race). There is an agenda behind “hate crime” laws. Hate-crime legislation is an attempt at thought control. It is another tool in the arsenal of the ruling elite to divide and conquer the nations and peoples of the world. It is one more nail in the coffin to bury our freedoms – freedom of thought, of conscience, of religion and of speech. Thanks to unconstitutional “hate crime” laws in our once free and enlightened nation, simple civil offenses are now considered felony crimes. A time of “gross darkness” is enveloping the earth (Jer. 13:16; Joel 2:2; Zeph. 1:15). Poet George Santayana said, “Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.” (The Life of Reason, George Santayana, 1917, p. 284).

The nineteenth century Constitutional scholar and Supreme Court Justice Joseph Story said, “This constitution of government, must perish, if there be not that vital spirit in the people which alone can nourish, sustain, and direct all its movements. It is in vain that statesmen shall form plans of government in which the beauty and harmony of a republic shall be embodied in visible order, shall be built upon solid substructions, and adorned by every useful ornament, if the inhabitants suffer the silent power of time to dilapidate its walls or crumble its massy supporters into dust, if the assaults from without are never resisted and the rottenness and mining from within are never guarded against. Who can preserve the rights and liberties of a people when they shall be abandoned by themselves? Who shall keep watch in the temple when the watchmen sleep at their post? Who shall call upon the people to redeem their possessions and revive the republic, when their own hands have deliberately and corruptly surrendered them to the oppressor and have built the prisons or dug the graves of their own friends ? This dark picture, it is to be hoped, will never be applicable to the republic of America. And yet it affords a warning, which, like all the lessons of past experience, we are not permitted to disregard.”(Christian Life and Character of the Civil Institutions of the United States, 1864, p. 269)

Congregationalist minister and Harvard graduate, Jonathan Mayhew, is considered by many to be the prophet of the American Revolution. In 1750 Mayhew published a sermon entitled “A Discourse Concerning Unlimited Submission and Non-Resistance to the Higher Powers” in which he addressed the issue of obedience to a higher authority as required by Romans 13, stating, “That no civil rulers are to be obeyed when they enjoin things that are inconsistent with the commands of God…. All commands running counter to the declared will of the Supreme Legislator of heaven and earth are null and void, and therefore disobedience to them is a duty, not a crime.” Mayhew continued: “From whence it follows, that as soon as the prince sets himself up above law, he loses the king in the tyrant. He does, to all intents and purposes, unking himself by acting out of and beyond that sphere which the constitution allows him to move in; and in such cases he has no more right to be obeyed than any inferior officer who acts beyond his commission.”(A Discourse Concerning Unlimited Submission and Non-Resistance to the Higher Powers, Jonathan Mayhew, 1750, pp. 37, 38, 45)

In his famous speech at Richmond, Virginia, March 23, 1775, American patriot Patrick Henry said, “This is no time for ceremony. The question before the house is one of awful moment to this country. For my own part, I consider it as nothing less than a question of freedom or slavery; and in proportion to the magnitude of the subject ought to be the freedom of the debate. It is only in this way that we can hope to arrive at truth, and fulfil the great responsibility which we hold to God and our country. Should I keep back my opinions at such a time, through fear of giving offence, I should consider myself as guilty of treason towards my country, and of an act of disloyalty toward the Majesty of Heaven, which I revere above all earthly kings.”(American Patriotism: Speeches, Letters, and Other Papers, 1880, p. 108)

In 1851 The Family Christian Almanac stated: “If truth be not diffused, error will be; if God and His Word are not known and received, the devil and his works will gain the ascendancy.” (The Family Christian Almanac for the United States, 1851, p. 34). Daniel Webster stated that “If we and our posterity shall be true to the Christian religion, —if we and they shall live always in the fear of God and shall respect his commandments,… —we may have the highest hopes of the future fortunes of our country;… But if we and our posterity neglect religious instruction and authority, violate the rules of eternal justice, trifle with the injunctions of morality, and recklessly destroy the political constitution which holds us together, no man can tell how sudden a catastrophe may overwhelm us that shall bury all our glory in profound obscurity.”(Christian Life and Character of the Civil Institutions of the United States, 1864, p. 270).

Historian Charles A. Goodrich said in 1830, “Thus it is evident that wickedness and infidelity are certainly, though sometimes slowly, punished by Him who is just, although merciful: and if he has hitherto graciously refrained from visiting the sins of this nation with the punishment which they deserve, let us not be vain of that exemption: let us not attribute it to any merit of our own; but rather let it afford an additional motive to our gratitude and praise; let us unfeignedly thank him for his tender mercies daily vouchsafed to us;” (Book Of Martyrs, 1830, pp.66,67). The apostle Paul said, “For when they shall say, Peace and safety; then sudden destruction cometh upon them, as travail upon a woman with child; and they shall not escape.” (I Thess. 5:3). The apostle Peter said, “Save yourselves from this untoward generation.” (Acts 2:40).

Our only hope is to uphold and defend the U. S. Constitution, “the supreme Law of the Land”, and repent of our sins and return to the God of our Founding Fathers, the God of the Bible. Our U.S. house of representatives summed it up well in a resolve passed in 1854: “Whereas, The people of these United States, from their earliest history to the present time, have been led by the hand of a kind Providence, and are indebted for the countless blessings of the past and present, and dependent for continued prosperity in the future upon Almighty God; and whereas the great vital and conservative element in our system is the belief of our people in the pure doctrines and divine truths of the gospel of Jesus Christ, it eminently becomes the representatives of a people so highly favored to acknowledge in the most public manner their reverence for God:” (Christian Life and Character of The Civil Institutions of The United States, Benjamin F. Morris, 1864, pp. 327, 328). Daniel Webster said in a speech on June 3, 1834, “God grants liberty only to those who love it, and are always ready to guard and defend it.” (Speeches and Forensic Arguments, Daniel Webster, Vol. II, p. 363).

FEMA Says Founding Fathers Were Terrorists!

U.S. Army Prepares To Invade U.S. ?

U.S./ Foreign Troops Gearing Up for Martial Law In America!

Marines Prepare For Martial Law in Indiana! Violate P.C.A.

Marines and Foreign Troops Training for Martial law!

What of ‘Posse Comitatus’?

Clergy Response Teams – Feds Train Clergy To Misuse Romans 13

THE PRICE OF FREEDOM
Have you ever wondered what happened to the men who signed the Declaration of Independence?


————————— Articles and Books by Various Authors —————————

1 JOHN 5:7 – KJV “ERRORS” ABORTION FACTS ALLEGED KJV ERRORS: Easter/Passover ANOTHER BIBLE – ANOTHER GOSPEL APOCRYPHA ARE YOU A MORMON ? BEWARE OF FALSE PROPHETS BIBLE VERSIONS – WHICH IS THE REAL WORD OF GOD? CHRIST’S MASS – HISTORY REVEALS THE TRUTH CHRISTMAS 2000 Years Before Christ CORRUPT LEXICONS AND DICTIONARIES COULD THIS BE THE MARK OF THE BEAST ? FOX’s BOOK of MARTYRS FREE MASONRY EXPOSED GOD and AMERICA GOT MORALS ? HISTORY OF BAPTISM HISTORY OF THE RED LETTER EDITION IMPORTANT NEWS ARTICLES IN AWE OF THY WORD IN DEFENSE OF ERASMUS IS SUNDAY SACRED AND HOLY ? JESUS’ BIRTH – THE UNTOLD STORY KING JAMES VERSION BIBLE FACTS KJV 1611 – THE MYTH OF EARLY REVISIONS LUCIFER: ANGEL OF LIGHT – FATHER OF LIES NEW AGE BIBLE VERSIONS OLD TESTAMENT TEXTS ONLY ONE GOD PROPHECIES OF THE MESSIAH FULFILLED IN JESUS CHRIST REMEMBER THE SABBATH DAY RETURN TO THE OLD PATHS — EXCERPT FROM THE MORNING STARS ROMAN CATHOLIC AND PROTESTANT CONFESSIONS ABOUT SUNDAY SCRIPTURES FROM THE HOLY BIBLE SEPTUAGINT SPIRITUAL   ADULTERY THE 1611 KJV DEDICATORY THE BIG BANG THE CATHOLIC PRIESTHOOD (by a former priest) THE KINGDOM OF HEAVEN IS AT HAND THE GOD OF HEAVEN OR THE god OF THIS WORLD ? THE SEVEN SEALS OF THE HOLY BIBLE THE TEN COMMANDMENTS THE TRUE SABBATH WHAT’S WRONG WITH HALLOWEEN WHAT MUST I DO TO BE SAVED ? WHO IS KING JAMES ? WICCA/PAGAN — SATANIC TIES WORLD RELIGIONS WORLD  RELIGIONS  –  Article 2

I believe the antichrist system is already in charge. Babylon, reborn in the religious system, the Opus Dei, took control of the Vatican Banks in 1981 and along with control of the World Council of Churches, we have that leg of the three-legged milk-stool. The secret societies are flourishing and the recruiting of men into Freemasonry has reached into State Fairs and public events. This all goes back to the families: Rothchilds, Rockefellers and the Opus Banks. They control the buying, selling, food distribution and, in turn, control the people.

“Little children, it is the last time: and as ye have heard that antichrist shall come, even now are there many antichrists; whereby we know that it is the last time.” (1 John 2:18)

As secret global meetings of government officials and private power elites convene to discuss and to influence the course of world history, the world’s major media organizations remain curiously silent and apparently uninterested. Why are groups like the Trilateral Commission, the Council on Foreign Relations, the Bilderbergers, the Illuminati – groups whose members are obviously powerful with connections to wealth and political influence – never the subject of the evening news? Why are secret societies – some of which have been at work on the world stage for centuries – never given attention to by Liberal or even most Conservative news outlets? Most people don’t realize secret societies exist because their minds have been conditioned to reject any thought of such organizations. Who or what is actually behind the sinister forces at work to move the world toward global government and a universal religion? It is Lucifer himself, “that old serpent, called the Devil, and Satan,” whom the Bible calls “the god of this world” “which deceiveth the whole world” (II Cor. 4:4; Rev. 12:9). The Bible tells us to “Put on the whole armour of God, that ye may be able to stand against the wiles of the devil. For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places.” (Eph. 6:11,12): “the spirit that now worketh in the children of disobedience” (Eph. 2:2). Even nineteenth century occultist F. Hort, one of the men who helped to produce the corrupt English Revised Version bible of 1881, understood that there are spiritual “influences” involved in moving man towards a new world order and one world religion: “At present very many orthodox but rational men are being unawares acted on by influences which will assuredly bear good fruit in due time; if the process is allowed to go on quietly….” (Life & Letters of F.J.A. Hort, Vol. 1, page 400).

 

Jesuit Extreme Oath of Induction

514px-adolfo_nicolas_sup-_gc3a9n1

JESUIT Extreme Oath of Induction
 as recorded in the Journals of the 62D Congress, 3d Session of the U.S.
(House Calendar No. 397. Report No. 1523)
Congressional Record—House, 15 Feb. 1913, pp3215-3216

I_______________ , now in the presence of Almighty God, the blessed Virgin Mary, the blessed St. John the Baptist, the Holy Apostles, St. Peter and St. Paul, and all the saints, sacred host of Heaven, and to you, my Ghostly Father, the superior general of the Society of Jesus, founded by St. Ignatius Loyola, in the pontification of Paul the III, and continued to the present, do by the womb of the Virgin, the matrix of God, and the rod of Jesus Christ, declare and swear that His Holiness, the Pope, is Christ’s vice regent and is the true and only head of the Catholic or Universal Church throughout the earth; and that by the virtue of the keys of binding and loosing given His Holiness by my Saviour, Jesus Christ, he hath power to depose heretical kings, princes, States, Commonwealths, and Governments and they may be safely destroyed. Therefore to the utmost of my power I will defend this doctrine and His Holiness’s right and custom against all usurpers of the heretical or Protestant authority whatever, especially the Lutheran Church of Germany, Holland, Denmark, Sweden and Norway, and the now pretended authority and Church’s of England and Scotland, and the branches of same now established in Ireland and on the continent of America and elsewhere and all adherents in regard that they may be usurped and heretical, opposing the sacred Mother Church of Rome. I do now denounce and disown any allegiance as due to any heretical king, prince or State, named Protestant or Liberal, or obedience to any of their laws, magistrates or officers. I do further declare that the doctrine of the Churches of England and Scotland of the Calvinists, Huguenots, and others of the name of Protestants or Masons to be damnable, and they themselves to be damned who will not forsake the same. I do further declare that I will help, assist, and advise all or any of His Holiness’s agents, in any place where I should be, in Switzerland, Germany, Holland, Ireland or America, or in any other kingdom or territory I shall come to, and do my utmost to extirpate the heretical Protestant or Masonic doctrines and to destroy all their pretended powers, legal or otherwise. I do further promise and declare that, notwithstanding I am dispensed with to assume any religion heretical for the propagation of the Mother Church’s interest; to keep secret and private all her agents counsels from time to time, as they intrust me, and not divulge, directly or indirectly, by word, writing or circumstances whatever, but to execute all that should be proposed, given in charge, or discovered unto me by you, my Ghostly Father, or any of this sacred order. I do further promise and declare that I will have no opinion or will of my own or any mental reservation whatever, even as a corpse or cadaver (perinde ac cadaver), but will unhesitatingly obey each and every command that I may receive from my superiors in the militia of the Pope and of Jesus Christ. That I will go to any part of the world whithersoever I may be sent, to the frozen regions north, jungles of India, to the centers of civilization of Europe, or to the wild haunts of the barbarous savages of America without murmuring or repining, and will be submissive in all things whatsoever is communicated to me. I do further promise and declare that I will, when opportunity presents, make and wage relentless war, secretly and openly, against all heretics, Protestants and Masons, as I am directed to do, to extirpate them from the face of the whole earth; and that I will spare neither age, sex or condition, and that will hang, burn, waste, boil, flay, strangle, and bury alive these infamous heretics; rip up the stomachs and wombs of their women, and crush their infant’s heads against the walls in order to annihilate their execrable race. That when the same cannot be done openly I will secretly use the poisonous cup, the strangulation cord, the steel of the poniard, or the leaden bullet, regardless of the honor, rank, dignity or authority of the persons, whatever may be their condition in life, either public or private, as I at any time may be directed so to do by any agents of the Pope or Superior of the Brotherhood of the Holy Father of the Society of Jesus. In confirmation of which I hereby dedicate my life, soul, and all corporal powers, and with the dagger which I now receive I will subscribe my name written in my blood in testimony thereof; and should I prove false or weaken in my determination may my brethren and fellow soldiers of the militia of the Pope cut off my hands and feet and my throat from ear to ear, my belly opened and sulphur burned therein with all the punishment that can be inflicted upon me on earth and my soul shall be tortured by demons in eternal hell forever. That I will in voting always vote for a Knight of Columbus in preference to a Protestant, especially a Mason, and that I will leave my party so to do; that if two Catholics are on the ticket I will satisfy myself which is the better supporter of Mother Church and vote accordingly. That I will not deal with or employ a Protestant if in my power to deal with or employ a Catholic. That I will place Catholic girls in Protestant families that a weekly report may be made of the inner movements of the heretics. That I will provide myself with arms and ammunition that I may be in readiness when the word is passed, or I am commanded to defend the church either as an individual or with the militia of the Pope. All of which I,_______________, do swear by the blessed Trinity and blessed sacrament which I am now to receive to perform and on part to keep this my oath. In testimony hereof, I take this most holy and blessed sacrament of the Eucharist and witness the same further with my name written with the point of this dagger dipped in my own blood and seal in the face of this holy sacrament.